No Crystal Ball For Predicting Risk
"Taking the angst out of taking a gamble" (Finance, July 21) was timely. But the value-at-risk (VAR) technology is less reliable than some academic proponents would like us to believe. The actual probability of a specified loss can vary by as much as one order of magnitude (10 times) from the probability estimated by value-at-risk methods.
To continue reading this article you must be a Bloomberg Professional Service Subscriber.
If you believe that you may have received this message in error please let us know.