The Rolls-Royce of British Jobs Ain't What It Used to Be
For any management-minded British engineer, there's no bigger job than becoming chief executive of Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc. Warren East, a well-regarded technology enthusiast, may end up crushed by the size of the task.
East, 55, spent more than a decade transforming U.K. chip designer ARM Holdings into a world-beater. ARM was bought this year by Japan's SoftBank for a staggering 24 billion pounds ($29.4 billion), suggesting he did a good job.
Few would have begrudged him spending the rest of his professional life holding cushy non-executive roles, giving speeches and playing his beloved church organ on weekends. But at Rolls-Royce he's opted for arguably the toughest job in British industry. After a difficult first 18 months, there's little relief in sight in 2017 for the jet engine and turbine maker.
True, a rebound in oil prices may help Rolls-Royce's struggling marine division. Even so, the group probably won't generate much cash flow next year, after an expected outflow of as much as 300 million pounds in 2016.
While analysts anticipate net income will rise to more than 600 million pounds in 2017, that overstates Rolls-Royce's health because of its odd accounting - of which more anon.
To his credit, East's lost no time slashing costs and cutting jobs and has scored some successes: increasing financial disclosure, speeding up aircraft engine production and dispensing with Rolls-Royce's imperious management culture. But the long development cycles in aerospace mean East isn't entirely the master of his destiny. The Rolls-Royce course was set long before he arrived.
The company's 70.5 billion pound civil order book is focused on the wide-body jet market, where Rolls-Royce is aiming for a 50 percent share. Yet that's a questionable ambition in itself because single-aisle jets are able to fly much further these days and they've sold much better than their fatter brethren.
More important, there's no guarantee that Rolls-Royce's orders, which mostly pre-date East, will ultimately generate lots of cash and profits. One reason for the recent profit woes is that older jets were grounded sooner than managers calculated, meaning Rolls-Royce didn't get the expected service revenues. In view of the huge cost of delivering (and then maintaining) such a large order book it's reasonable to ask whether there's anything else previous management got wrong.
There are other grounds for caution. Last month, East shocked investors when he revealed Rolls-Royce's core civil aerospace unit is loss-making under the more orthodox revenue recognition practices it will have to adopt from 2018.
Deutsche Bank analyst Ben Fidler thinks the civil engine division, which contributes about half of Rolls-Royce revenue, won't make an operating profit until 2019 under the new accounting rules. That will be four years after East first took over.
Furthermore, when the company stops capitalizing engine losses on its balance sheet in 2018, as it's done up until now, shareholder equity could be almost wiped out, according to Credit Suisse.
Despite those chastening views, Rolls-Royce still trades on 25 times estimated earnings, a hefty premium to French rival Safran SA -- and that's before you adjust for Rolls-Royce's accounting peculiarities.
Such a rich valuation shows investors' faith that East knows what he's doing. But that confidence could evaporate quickly if he can't provide tangible proof that Rolls-Royce's order book is creating value.
A crucial test will come in 2018, when the company has implied it will target about 500 million pounds of free cash flow. 1 That's going to be tough. East said last month that Rolls-Royce loses up to 2 million pounds on each new engine produced. He may come to regret not spending more time trying to perfect his organ pedal technique.
To contact the author of this story:
Chris Bryant in Frankfurt at email@example.com
To contact the editor responsible for this story:
James Boxell at firstname.lastname@example.org
To continue reading this article you must be a Bloomberg Professional Service Subscriber.
If you believe that you may have received this message in error please let us know.