Shareholders in Takata are understandably terrified at the prospect that liabilities stemming from the company's occasionally fatal airbag technology will blow up in their faces.
Its shares have fallen almost 70 percent since Nov. 18, 2014, when the U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration ordered a recall of millions of vehicles fitted with Takata's defective inflators. The company's market capitalization of 31 billion yen ($289 million) is now a spare 0.22 times Takata's book value of about 145 billion yen, making it one of just 13 publicly traded businesses globally with more than $1 billion in annual sales and a valuation no greater than 0.25 times book.
What's surprising is that while equity investors are spooked, bondholders have maintained a distinct sangfroid. The steepest discount among its three outstanding yen-denominated notes is that on its 0.582 percent debentures due 2021, which are trading at about 74 percent of par. Its 1.021 percent securities maturing in 2017 are trading at a discount of less than 8 percent to face value:
This is, to put it mildly, not how the debt of companies facing Takata-style problems normally behaves. Take a look at how Sharp's bond yields soared north of 40 percent within months of the electronics company announcing the first job cuts since 1950 amid widening losses in 2012. Or what happened to Peabody's yields after coking coal prices sank to a six-year low in 2014, pushing the U.S. miner toward the Chapter 11 bankruptcy it finally entered last month:
There are a few potential explanations for what may be going on here.
One is that bondholders are betting they'll be left whole, or whole-ish, if the company's customers or other sponsors step in to turn it around. Sharp actually offers an optimistic story in this context: Those 2019 notes that were yielding more than 40 percent a few years back now pay less than 5 percent. Still, given recall costs that could easily run into hundreds of millions of yen or more, and the fact bond haircuts are a pretty standard feature of restructurings, that seems a wager based more on hope than reasonable expectation.
Another is that lawyers will take a long time to argue how the costs of Takata's product recall should be allotted. So long as Takata has sufficient liquidity to pay its interest bills in the short term, a bond maturing in December 2017 that's yielding 6.5 percent might not be such a bad investment.
There's one more possible explanation. A Japan where the government can sell 10-year bonds with a negative yield is probably not your best yardstick of a well-functioning credit market. When investors are paying money for the privilege of lending it, lots of things that may otherwise seem unappealing start to look more attractive. Takata's 2021 bonds are yielding 8.2 percent at current prices. If you try not to think too hard about the risk of default, that looks almost appetizing.
This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of Bloomberg LP and its owners.
Also called the acid ratio, the quick ratio gauges a company's short-term liquidity by dividing its current liabilities into its cash, cash equivalents and account receivables. A figure of 1 is usually considered the minimal comfortable level.
To contact the author of this story:
David Fickling in Sydney at email@example.com
To contact the editor responsible for this story:
Katrina Nicholas at firstname.lastname@example.org