Has the SEC Held Back in Pursuit of Big Banks?

REPLAY VIDEO
Your next video will start in
Pause

Recommended Videos

  • Info

  • Comments

  • VIDEO TEXT

April 8 (Bloomberg) -- Tom Sporkin, partner at BuckleySandler, discusses criticism of the SEC by a retiring trial attorney compared to his experience at the regulator on Bloomberg Television’s “Market Makers.”

It is like pouring gasoline on a fire that has been slowly burning under the sec for years.

How much truth telling is going on here and how much of it is sour grapes?

The perception from the story you read today is that the supervisors at the sec did not listen to all the voices of the room.

I found my experience there to be the opposite.

When the vision -- division was being led into thousand nine, he looked to the staff for how the reorganization should occur.

He reorganized.

Whenever he had a big matter that needed a decision about whether to bring a case, he also listened to the voices in the room in a manner similar to the way he reorganized the division.

My experience is quite different.

I had my subordinates in the room with rob and he would listen to their opinions over mine.

I had a different experience.

Did you work with james kidney at any point?

Our house and not cross.

I knew him and he was a very good trial attorney.

I am surprised that he would have these statements to make.

I read of this is that he did have an opportunity to make his points known and at several points people above him decided to go in a different direction.

His allegations go beyond just that had voice -- his voice wasn't heard.

It involved paulson and goldman sachs.

He said they regularly were too scared to go after the top dogs on wall street, the people and firms that it is charged by congress with regulating people --. in part because these lawyers working at the sec were concerned about what kinds of jobs they would get in the private sector after leaving the agency.

Does that ring true to you?

I have heard that from federal judges.

I don't find in my experience that was the case.

There are very talented attorneys to go to the sec to perform public service.

There is a lifespan that you have the sec.

At some point you have to leave.

Some may say that the corporate world is better because people leave the sec and go and counsel those same corporations as to how to abide by the law.

They can take those expertise and get paid handsomely by these corporations and teach them how to outsmart the system.

Goldman sachs has deeper pockets than the sec does.

I don't think they are outsmarting the sec.

I think they are well represented by professionals who understand how the sec works.

They understand how to advise their corporate clients on how to comply with sec regulations.

Is it possible that in the backs of the minds of these people, they were thinking about the future?

Let's be honest, these are settlement negotiations.

They produce a less toothy result.

In any other case, it doesn't really matter.

If they would've thought of their careers as sec lawyers that were going to retire at the sec and not from a corporate firm.

I would say there is an equal voice on the other side that would say the bigger the headline you grab while you're at the sec, that will turn into bigger dollars when you get on the other side.

I have seen many aggressive professionals in the division of enforcement want to grab

This text has been automatically generated. It may not be 100% accurate.

Advertisement

BTV Channel Finder

Channel_finder_loader

ZIP is required for U.S. locations

Bloomberg Television in   change