Corporate Clash: Founders Versus CEO

REPLAY VIDEO
Your next video will start in
Pause

Recommended Videos

  • Info

  • Comments

  • VIDEO TEXT

July 11 (Bloomberg) -- Ajay Bhalla, Professor of Global Innovation at Cass Business School, discusses influence of founders on companies. He speaks on Bloomberg Television’s “The Pulse.” (Source: Bloomberg)

Is delightful, and companies where founders come from strong families.

His coming from a family farm -- firm.

He has established the business with much passion.

When they see that the business is going in a different route than they had perceived, it is difficult.

Is it an emotional attachment?

We see that they are down for five successive quarters.

The man who is going to change the face of the pc market had to go.

Is that an emotional attachment?

From a founder perspective, there is a hubris.

The second point is, in this case, when they make an exit and they see that their emotional bonds -- even though they have made a negative, they maintain its.

-- maintain it.

I talked to a guy who is setting up a luxury company and he is using his name to be the figurehead of the company.

If your name is attached to it, does that make it harder, do you think it's mark absolutely.

In the case of morrison's, we sophomores coming back -- we saw morrison coming back.

There are different situations . making an exit is always very attractive.

The comeback -- the idea that they will save the company -- is not as difficult -- as easy.

Devon performed brilliantly when the company went up.

What about steve jobs deutsche mark there is an enigma attached to steve jobs.

Jobs, as you know, returns.

I think it was a miracle , or lock, in many perceptions.

The examples are few.

When you see how founders exit, and bring in shareholders, but not going onto the public markets, is there a difference in the approaches?

These companies are small.

As they grow, regulation gets much higher when you go public.

Going public weakens the founder control.

Going public , they often find themselves in difficult situations when making a comeback.

They are under a spotlight.

When they are private, the options, i think, are broader.

They can exercise influence their mechanisms.

I think the examples that you are seeing -- the company wanted an ipo or the founder decide to exit.

Thank you very much.

Did to give a heads up on what is coming up.

This text has been automatically generated. It may not be 100% accurate.

Advertisement

BTV Channel Finder

Channel_finder_loader

ZIP is required for U.S. locations

Bloomberg Television in   change