Bloomberg the Company & Products

Bloomberg Anywhere Login


Connecting decision makers to a dynamic network of information, people and ideas, Bloomberg quickly and accurately delivers business and financial information, news and insight around the world.


Financial Products

Enterprise Products


Customer Support

  • Americas

    +1 212 318 2000

  • Europe, Middle East, & Africa

    +44 20 7330 7500

  • Asia Pacific

    +65 6212 1000


Industry Products

Media Services

Follow Us

May 23, 2015 12:52 AM ET

Internet and Catalog Retail

Company Overview of Inc.

Company Overview Inc., doing business as Shopping, operates as an online retailing company for consumers and businesses. The company focuses on e-commerce, finance, and digital content. It offers computers and office products, such as laptops and desktops, networking, printers and scanners, components, hard drives, monitors, projectors and screens, software, computer accessories and peripherals, and office supplies. The company also provides electronics, including TV and video products, cameras, home theater and audio products, personal electronics, cell phones, and car electronics and GPS products. In addition, it offers fashion and beauty products, such as women products, men’s products...

85 Enterprise

Suite 100

Aliso Viejo, CA 92656

United States

Founded in 1997

115 Employees





Key Executives for Inc.

Senior Vice President of Finance and Accounting
Chief Technology Officer
Director of Business Development
Vice President of Marketing
Compensation as of Fiscal Year 2014. Inc. Key Developments

H-W Technology, L.C. Files Patent Infringement Action Against Apple and Several Other Defendants Including Amazon and

H-W Technology, L.C. filed a patent infringement action against Apple and several other defendants including Amazon and H-W alleged that it had ownership of U.S. Patent No. 7,525,955, entitled internet protocol phone with search and advertising capability the 955 patent. The 955 patent is directed to systems and methods of using a multi-convergence device, including phones commonly referred to as smart phones, which are able to converge voice and data within a single terminal, and which allow users of such devices via domain specific applications to receive information and offers from merchants and to complete a transaction with one of said merchants without having to generate a phone call. The defendants argued that claims 1 and 17 of the patent were indefinite and invalid under 35 U.S.C. 112, paragraph 2, for combining two statutory classes of invention within a single claim. The defendants also asserted that claim construction was not necessary to rule on the motion to dismiss because H-W had not included any argument in its claim construction briefs regarding the subject-matter class covered by the claim language at issue. H-W asserted that the validity of its patent claims had to be considered on summary judgment context, with the benefit of claim construction and expert discovery, and not on a motion to dismiss. The district court agreed with H-W, finding that at least one court in this district has held that claim indefiniteness is a matter which is more appropriately addressed through summary judgment. See Mannatech, Inc. v. TechMedia Health, Inc., No. 3:06-CV-00813-P, 2009 WL 3614359, at 15 (N.D. Tex. Oct. 29, 2009) (determination of claim indefiniteness is not appropriate at the claim construction stage because a court must first attempt to determine what a claim means before it can determine whether the claim is invalid for indefiniteness). Another court in this circuit has refused to consider validity arguments even on a summary judgment motion, reasoning that claim construction had not yet occurred. See Innovention Toys, LLC v. MGA Entm't, Inc., No. 07-6510, 2009 WL 424398, at 8 (E.D. La. Feb. 19, 2009) '[I]t is incumbent on a court to set forth its construction of any disputed terms before making findings on validity unless the court determines that the resolution of claim construction would not impact its ruling. The defendants also contended that H-W had failed to plead sufficient facts to support a claim for direct infringement under 35 U.S.C. 271(a). As explained by the district court, "[a]s in their first motion, Defendants again argue that claim 9 is a method claim with steps requiring performance by at least two parties. They contend that to succeed on its direct infringement claim, Plaintiff must make joint infringement allegations against the defendants- and that it has not done so. (Docs. 195 at 15-17; 391 at 2-3.) Defendants contend that a cognizable claim of joint infringement requires identification of a second party and an allegation that each defendant exercises control over the second party through an agency or contractual relationship. Contrary to the defendants' assertion, H-W maintained that the method may be performed by a single party and that the court cannot properly decide Defendants' motion without engaging in claim construction. H-W therefore contended that the Defendants' motion was premature and should also be denied on grounds that the Court had not yet issued its claim construction ruling.

Similar Private Companies By Industry

Company Name Region
Penske Direct, LLC United States
Winchester Carpet & Rug Co., Inc. United States
MotoSport, Inc. United States
EconOffice Products & Supplies, Inc. United States
4 less on the Web, LLC United States

Recent Private Companies Transactions

No transactions available in the past 12 months.

Stock Quotes

Market data is delayed at least 15 minutes.

Company Lookup

Most Searched Private Companies

Company Name Geographic Region
Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights Under Law United States
NYC2012, Inc. United States
Bertelsmann AG Europe
Rush University United States
Citizens Budget Commission United States

Sponsored Financial Commentaries

Sponsored Links

Report Data Issue

To contact Inc., please visit Company data is provided by Capital IQ. Please use this form to report any data issues.

Please enter your information in the following field(s):
Update Needed*

All data changes require verification from public sources. Please include the correct value or values and a source where we can verify.

Your requested update has been submitted

Our data partners will research the update request and update the information on this page if necessary. Research and follow-up could take several weeks. If you have questions, you can contact them at