GM Aims to Lower Labor Costs With Buyouts, Cheaper Hires
General Motors Co. (GM) will move to entice electricians and its other highest-paid U.S. hourly workers to retire so it can hire lower-wage replacements through a four-year labor agreement with the United Auto Workers.
GM, the biggest U.S. automaker, will offer buyout packages worth as much as $75,000 to its roughly 10,000 skilled-trades workers, the Detroit-based UAW said yesterday in a briefing with reporters. Other employees eligible to retire can take $10,000 to stop working within two years so that GM can replace them with new hires starting with wages of less than $16 an hour.
UAW President Bob King said the agreement achieves some of the union’s major goals in talks with the Detroit-based automaker, which emerged from U.S.-backed bankruptcy in 2009. The accord up for a ratification vote by 48,500 members calls for GM to invest $2.5 billion through four years, reopen a plant in Tennessee and add or retain jobs at six other factories.
“It’s all about demographics and attrition for GM now,” said Brian Johnson, a Chicago-based analyst for Barclays Capital, who has an “overweight” rating on GM. The agreement allows GM to replace more expensive workers with an unlimited number of employees at the entry-level wages, which is “a plus that people weren’t expecting,” he said.
GM will save $30 an hour for every skilled-trade employee who leaves and is replaced by a lower-paid worker, said Kristin Dziczek, director of the labor and industry group at the Center for Automotive Research in Ann Arbor, Michigan. That adds up to $57,000 a year per worker who is replaced, she said.
About 4,000 skilled-trades employees and 11,550 production workers are eligible to retire, according to GM.
Attrition of those employees would make room for entry- level workers whose starting pay will increase to at least $14.78 an hour from $14 as part of the UAW’s agreement with GM. The wage rises to as much $19.28 an hour by 2015 from a previous maximum of $16.23.
GM may find it difficult to get workers to leave in the next year, said Arthur Schwartz, a former GM labor negotiator. The $10,000 buyout is available for two years to production workers. Those same employees will be eligible for several payouts in that span, including profit sharing, annual $1,000 checks to protect against inflation and bonuses tied to quality.
“Why wouldn’t they wait another two years?” said Schwartz, president of Ann Arbor, Michigan-based consulting firm Labor & Economics Associates. “There is a lot of money that will be paid over that time period, and the $10,000 isn’t going away.”
There’s no limit to the number of workers who can be hired at entry-level wages, said Joe Ashton, the union’s vice president for GM relations. In 2015, the second tier would be capped at 25 percent, according to King.
“We would love to see it at 40 percent because that would mean our workforce would have grown,” Ashton said of GM’s portion of workers earning lower wages. About 4 percent of GM- UAW workers are receiving that pay now, he said.
GM is offering $10,000 buyouts to all employees who retire within two years, the UAW said yesterday, and the automaker will offer additional $65,000 bonuses to skilled-trades workers who leave between Nov. 1 and March 31.
GM’s accord also calls for the company to provide a record $5,000 lump-sum signing bonuses. The largest U.S. automaker will invest $419 million to reopen the assembly plant in Spring Hill, Tennessee, which will make two midsize cars and hire 1,710 people. The agreement adds or retains 6,400 jobs, the UAW said.
GM will add a shift at a full-size van factory in Wentzville, Missouri, to make midsize pickups, such as the Chevrolet Colorado and GMC Canyon and boost output in Michigan at two powertrain plants and a casting factory, the union said. GM also committed $230 million to continue assembling trucks in Fort Wayne, Indiana, where workers make Chevrolet Silverado and GMC Sierra pickups.
A midsize truck plant in Shreveport, Louisiana, will close. The union is still pushing GM to extend the use of the factory and consider adding stamping work there, Ashton said. A plant in Janesville, Wisconsin, will remain on standby, the UAW said.
Employees who were moved from a shuttered factory get return-home rights and will receive up to $30,000 relocation payments, the UAW said.
Chief Executive Officer Dan Akerson said when talks began in July that the automaker wanted to manage costs while giving UAW-represented workers the “opportunity to share in the success of the company going forward.” GM reported $6.36 billion of profit in the first half and $6.17 billion last year.
“This is, of course, a less risky contract,” Sean McAlinden, chief economist at the Center for Automotive Research, said yesterday in an e-mail. “If the market heads south, so does labor compensation.”
GM pledged to base its profit-sharing arrangement on a greater portion of the automaker’s income, the UAW said. Annual profit-sharing checks will be determined by GM earnings in North America instead of just the U.S. The plan equates to bonuses of about $1,000 per $1 billion in North American profit.
The agreement requires a minimum profit in North America of $1.25 billion to produce a payout and caps distributions to workers at $12,000, the UAW said.
“This contract really shows the auto industry is back,” King said yesterday.
GM expects the union to hold ratification votes within 10 days, according to a Sept. 17 statement.
Union workers will get $1,000 “inflation protection” payments for the next three years. If they meet quality targets, they will be paid an additional $250 a year.
The UAW continues to negotiate with GM over a plan to divert 10 percent of workers’ profit-sharing payments to the union’s retiree health-care fund, Ashton said. The additional funds are intended to improve coverage for retirees. GM has questioned the legality of the diversion, Ashton said.
“There are some legal questions about that,” Ashton said. “We’re still negotiating with GM on that.”
GM fell $1.15, or 5.1 percent, to $21.28 at 4 p.m. in New York Stock Exchange composite trading. The shares have plunged 42 percent this year and are at the lowest since GM’s initial public offering in November.
The tentative agreement will be put to a vote by UAW members who King has estimated each gave $7,000 to $30,000 in concessions since 2005. Analysts Himanshu Patel of JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Johnson of Barclays said ratification was likely in separate research notes published Sept. 19.
“The economic gains for the membership are good,” Art Reyes, president of UAW Local 651 in Flint, Michigan, said in an interview. “I’ll recommend it to the membership.”
Contracts covering 113,000 workers at GM, Ford Motor Co. (F) and Chrysler Group LLC were set to expire Sept. 14 before being extended. Fiat SpA-controlled Chrysler is pushing for a smaller signing bonus than GM accepted, about $3,500, two people familiar with the talks said Sept. 19.
The UAW typically uses its first accord to set a pattern for pay and benefits at the other two organized U.S. automakers. Union negotiators will seek a deal with Auburn Hills, Michigan- based Chrysler next and then go to Dearborn, Michigan-based Ford, three people familiar with the talks have said.
“There is a general framework pattern we’ll go to Ford and Chrysler with,” King said yesterday. “I’m confident we can put an agreement together for both.”
UAW members agreed to a no-strike pledge at GM and Chrysler as part of their 2009 bankruptcies. Unsettled disputes are to be decided through binding arbitration.
Ford didn’t receive a U.S. bailout and UAW members there, going against the wishes of union leaders, rejected a strike ban and arbitration.
King, 65, has pledged to organize a foreign automaker this year to expand the UAW’s bargaining power beyond GM, Ford and Chrysler. The agreement with GM will help that effort, he said.
“Winning always helps you get momentum,” King said. “When workers see how we play such a key role in the success of the companies, that will have a big impact.”
To contact the reporters on this story: Craig Trudell in Southfield, Michigan at email@example.com; David Welch in Southfield, Michigan at firstname.lastname@example.org; Keith Naughton in Southfield, Michigan at email@example.com
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Jamie Butters at firstname.lastname@example.org