Hedge Funds May Pose Systemic Risk in Crisis, U.S. Report Says
Hedge funds and insurers might threaten U.S. economic stability in a time of crisis, according to a report aimed at helping regulators decide which non-bank financial companies warrant Federal Reserve supervision.
An exodus of hedge-fund investors could “cause activity in some markets to freeze,” said the Feb. 3 report by staff of the Financial Stability Oversight Council. The report, obtained by Bloomberg News, also said the failure of a large insurance company could “result in dramatic and destabilizing actions being taken by investors.”
The 80-page report is a preliminary draft that, without making recommendations, offers a glimpse of issues regulators, including Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke and Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner, will consider when deciding which firms should be designated “systemically important” and warrant central bank scrutiny. The council, created by last year’s Dodd-Frank financial overhaul law to prevent another financial crisis, may begin making those rulings by midyear.
Companies including Blackrock Inc., the world’s largest money manager, and lobbyists for the hedge-fund and mutual-fund industries have made the case to regulators they aren’t important enough to the financial system to merit the designation. Financial executives have said the costs of more regulation would put them at a disadvantage to their competitors.
The report also details possible criteria, marked “confidential,” that regulators could use to monitor risks related to firms’ market share and portfolio holdings. Some of the information is already available through public filings. In other cases, the companies would have to document financial information never before released to regulators.
For example, regulators could require hedge funds to provide information on value-at-risk, a measures of risk relative to investor capital. A ratio that’s too high “can make a fund more vulnerable to runs,” the report said.
The oversight council has authority to make companies under its jurisdiction raise capital, increase liquidity and sell assets deemed too concentrated in one segment of the economy. The staff report’s considerations “are meant to provide context and an initial filter” for regulators as they consider individual firms, the document said.
AIG, GE Capital
Geithner, the council’s chairman, suggested in September that such a list could encompass New York-based American International Group Inc., the bailed-out insurer, and GE Capital, a unit of Fairfield, Connecticut-based General Electric Co. that benefited from a government backstop for financial- company debt.
Steven Adamske, a Geithner spokesman, declined to comment on the document.
The FSOC report describes a $40 trillion investment management industry that includes retirement programs, private equity firms and $2.4 trillion in specialty funds that banks use to manage their assets. It also discusses the role of real estate lenders, broker-dealers and futures commission merchants.
Futures dealers who handle swaps, commodities and foreign exchange agreements could have a systemic impact if a “large default” set off a chain reaction within the industry, the report said. Such an event “could have devastating ramifications,” and regulators should assess a firm’s ability to cause such an event, the report said.
In the case of insurance, a big company’s failure could “reduce overall investor sentiment,” the report said. It noted relationships between the life insurance and corporate bond sector, and between municipal bond markets and property/casualty insurers.
“Insurance itself is essential for many day-to-day activities, such as shipping goods, purchasing cars or extending mortgages,” the report said. “A sector-wide crisis may have an adverse macroeconomic effect due to its role in the general conduct of economic activity.”
The report said regulators historically had “little reliable information” on the “opaque” hedge fund industry, which plays “a significant role in U.S. financial markets.” It said the industry has the potential for systemic impact and noted that about 200 advisers manage 80 percent of industry assets.
The Managed Funds Association, a Washington-based lobbying group whose members include D.E. Shaw & Co., Citadel LLC and SAC Capital Advisors LP, argued in a November letter to Geithner that hedge funds are too small to be systemically important, noting that the mutual-fund and banking sectors are much bigger.
Private-equity firms could be a source of risk because of the “highly leveraged nature of their portfolio companies and their use of bridge loans,” according to the staff report. It noted that out of the industry’s roughly 2,000 managers, about 250 oversee more than $1 billion in assets each.
The report also discussed retirement plans sponsored by non-profit organizations and state and local governments. “Many retirement plans are very large,” the document said. “Therefore, they could pose potential systemic risk.”
Money market funds, or MMFs, have systemic impact when they incur losses because the industry can be susceptible to runs, the report said.
In 2008, the $62.5 billion Reserve Primary Fund became the biggest money-market fund and the first in 14 years to “break the buck,” meaning the value of a share fell below $1 and investors faced losses. Reserve failed after investing in debt issued by Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc., the investment bank that declared the biggest-ever U.S. bankruptcy.
“Even a modest-sized MMF breaking the buck could, in principle, trigger a broad and damaging run,” the report said. “However, no individual MMF may warrant designation applying the factors” laid out in the Dodd-Frank financial overhaul law.
So-called liquidity funds, or unregistered money-market funds, suffered large investor withdrawals in 2007, the report said. “Although these runs may have been disruptive, they do not appear to have become systemic.” If the funds grow rapidly there could be “greater potential to pose systemic risk in the future.”
The staff report says some types of firms, such as venture capital funds and community development financial institutions, aren’t likely to pose risks because they generally don’t make leveraged bets. Closed-end funds, a type of investment company that issues equity securities, don’t offer investors redemption rights and therefore “primarily raise investor-protection concerns rather than potential systemic consequences,” the report said.
Thrift holding companies may warrant further study, the report said.
In addition to Geithner and Bernanke, the council’s 10 voting members include the chairmen of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission.
To contact the editors responsible for this story: Christopher Wellisz at email@example.com