Food-Safety Funding Battle Looms as Obama Prepares to Sign Reform Bill
President Barack Obama will sign a $1.4 billion food-safety bill today that marks the biggest change to oversight of the food industry since 1938 and sets up a funding fight with Republicans poised to take over the House.
The House subcommittee that monitors the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s budget may be unwilling to spend that much on the legislation, said Representative Jack Kingston, a Georgia Republican who is in line to become chairman of the panel.
The measure, passed by Congress last month, gives the FDA more power to police domestic and international producers. It authorizes more inspections, requires most food companies to develop hazard prevention plans and gives the agency the ability to force recalls of tainted products. Implementing the law would cost about $1.4 billion over five years, according to the Congressional Budget Office.
“There’s a high possibility of trimming this whole package back,” Kingston said yesterday in a telephone interview. “While it’s a great re-election tool to terrify people into thinking that the food they’re eating is unsafe and unsanitary, and if not for the wonderful nanny-state politicians we’d be getting sick after every meal, the system we have is doing a darn good job.”
Kingston, who voted against the food-safety bill, was the subcommittee’s senior Republican last year, when Democrats held a House majority. He is in line to head the panel after the Republican-controlled House convenes tomorrow.
Obama plans to sign the food-safety measure today, the White House said yesterday in an e-mailed statement. FDA Commissioner Margaret Hamburg said her agency will work closely with Congress to implement the law.
“I’m very optimistic that we will be able to move forward,” Hamburg said yesterday on a conference call.
While the U.S. has one of the safest food supplies in the world, “every day we see preventable illness, we see unnecessary hospitalizations and too many people have died from foodborne illness,” Hamburg said. “The costs of not going forward” to overhaul the system “are simply unacceptable.”
Foodborne germs sicken almost 48 million people in the U.S. each year, leading to 128,000 hospitalizations and 3,000 deaths, the Atlanta-based Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said last month.
The tally marked the agency’s first comprehensive food- poisoning estimates since 1999, when the CDC estimated that 76 million Americans contract foodborne illnesses each year, with 325,000 hospitalizations and 5,000 deaths. The CDC said the lower estimates were based on improved data and shouldn’t be viewed as reflecting a reduction in nationwide cases.
Health Care Costs
The costs of failing to overhaul the food-safety system would ultimately exceed the legislation’s implementation costs, said Erik Olson, director of food programs at the Pew Health Group in Washington. He cited a March report by Georgetown University’s Produce Safety Project that found foodborne illnesses cost the U.S. economy $152 billion in health care and related expenses.
“We will be seeking to make the case to Congress that this is an important expenditure, it’s important to public health and over the long run, it will save money,” Olson said yesterday on the FDA conference call
The Grocery Manufacturers Association was among industry groups that backed the legislation. The trade group has more than 300 members including Nestle SA of Vevey, Switzerland, and Northfield, Illinois-based Kraft Foods Inc., the world’s two biggest food companies.
“Ultimately, it is the food industry that is responsible for the safety of its products,” Pamela Bailey, president of the Washington-based group, said yesterday on the FDA conference call. “But we have long recognized that strong government oversight is a critical and necessary part of our nation’s food safety net.”
To contact the reporter on this story: Molly Peterson in Washington at firstname.lastname@example.org
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Adriel Bettelheim at email@example.com