Big Pharma's Crime Spree
Pfizer and Lilly lead a parade of U.S. companies that have paid
$7 billion in penalties after promoting drugs for uses not
approved by the FDA.
By David Evans
Bloomberg Markets, December 2009
Prosecutor Michael Loucks remembers clearly when lawyers
for Pfizer Inc., the world’s largest drug company, looked across
the table and promised it wouldn’t break the law again.
It was January 2004, and the attorneys were negotiating in
a conference room on the ninth floor of the federal courthouse
in Boston, where Loucks was head of the health-care fraud unit
of the U.S. Attorney’s Office. One of Pfizer’s units had been
pushing doctors to prescribe an epilepsy drug called Neurontin
for uses the Food and Drug Administration had never approved.
In the agreement the lawyers eventually hammered out, the
Pfizer unit, Warner-Lambert, pleaded guilty to two felony counts
of marketing a drug for unapproved uses.
New York-based Pfizer agreed to pay $430 million in
criminal fines and civil penalties, and the company’s lawyers
assured Loucks and three other prosecutors that Pfizer and its
units would stop promoting drugs for unauthorized purposes.
What Loucks, who’s now acting U.S. attorney in Boston,
didn’t know until years later was that Pfizer managers were
breaking that pledge not to practice so-called off-label
marketing even before the ink was dry on their plea.
On the morning of Sept. 2, 2009, another Pfizer unit,
Pharmacia & Upjohn, agreed to plead guilty to the same crime.
This time, Pfizer executives had been instructing more than 100
salespeople to promote Bextra, a drug approved only for the
relief of arthritis and menstrual discomfort, for treatment of
acute pains of all kinds.
Record High Fine
For this new felony, Pfizer paid the largest criminal fine
in U.S. history: $1.19 billion. On the same day, it paid $1
billion to settle civil cases involving the off-label promotion
of Bextra and three other drugs with the U.S. and 49 states.
“At the very same time Pfizer was in our office
negotiating and resolving the allegations of criminal conduct in
2004, Pfizer was itself in its other operations violating those
very same laws,” Loucks, 54, says. “They’ve repeatedly
marketed drugs for things they knew they couldn’t demonstrate
efficacy for. That’s clearly criminal.”
The penalties Pfizer paid this year for promoting Bextra
off-label were the latest chapter in the drug’s benighted
history. The FDA found Bextra to be so dangerous that Pfizer
took it off the market for all uses in 2005.
Across the U.S., pharmaceutical companies have been
pleading guilty to criminal charges or paying penalties in civil
cases when the U.S. Department of Justice finds that they
deceptively marketed drugs for unapproved uses, putting millions
of people at risk of chest infections, heart attacks, suicidal
impulses or death.
$7 Billion in Penalties
Since May 2004, Pfizer, Eli Lilly & Co., Bristol-Myers
Squibb Co. and four other drug companies have paid a total of $7
billion in fines and penalties. Six of the companies admitted in
court that they marketed medicines for unapproved uses.
In September 2007, New York-based Bristol-Myers paid $515
million -- without admitting or denying wrongdoing -- to federal
and state governments in a civil lawsuit brought by the Justice
Department. The six other companies pleaded guilty in criminal
cases.
In January 2009, Indianapolis-based Lilly, the largest U.S.
psychiatric drug maker, pleaded guilty and paid $1.42 billion in
fines and penalties to settle charges that it had for at least
four years illegally marketed Zyprexa, a drug approved for the
treatment of schizophrenia, as a remedy for dementia in elderly
patients.
In five company-sponsored clinical trials, 31 people out of
1,184 participants died after taking the drug for dementia --
twice the death rate for those taking a placebo. Those findings
were reported in an October 2005 article in the Journal of the
American Medical Association.
‘Don’t Respect the Law’
“Marketing departments of many drug companies don’t
respect any boundaries of professionalism or the law,” says
Jerry Avorn, a professor at Harvard Medical School in Boston and
author of “Powerful Medicines: The Benefits, Risks, and Costs
of Prescription Drugs” (Random House, 2004). “The Pfizer and
Lilly cases involved the illegal promotion of drugs that have
been shown to cause substantial harm and death to patients.”
The widespread off-label promotion of drugs is yet another
manifestation of a health-care system that has become
dysfunctional.
“It’s an unbearable cost to a system that’s going broke,”
says Avorn, who heads the pharmacology economics unit of Brigham
and Women’s Hospital in Boston. “We can’t even afford to pay
for effective, safe therapies.”
Click HERE to read the full version of this story