Pay Unchecked
Even with restrictions proposed by world leaders, banker
compensation is unlikely to fall.
By Ian Katz
Bloomberg Markets, December 2009
Global leaders and regulators trying to rein in banker pay are
proposing everything from clamping down on guaranteed bonuses to
recouping compensation from prior years if losses mount. Largely
unaddressed is the topic that stirs the most public ire: How
much money is too much?
The guidelines endorsed by U.S. President Barack Obama and the
rest of the Group of 20 nations aim to discourage excessive risk
taking by employees in the financial industry. Corporate
governance and compensation experts say new rules will help
eliminate plans like those that tied bonuses to the number of
subprime mortgage bonds created, for example, or rewarded trades
that later turned sour.
Mark Poerio, a lawyer who tracks compensation issues at Paul,
Hastings, Janofsky & Walker in Washington, says the proposed
rules for banker bonuses will better link rewards with behavior
that creates long-term success and stability. The restrictions
won’t cut pay overall, says Poerio, who advises financial
companies. “I would be shocked to see reductions,” he says.
Only at seven companies that received extraordinary bailouts are
paychecks being trimmed by the government, and just two of those
are large banks. Kenneth Feinberg, Obama’s special master on
compensation, is ordering that salaries be cut by an average of
90 percent and total compensation, with bonuses, be slashed by
an average of 50 percent for 25 top executives at these
companies. Bank of America Corp., Citigroup Inc. and insurer
American International Group Inc. are among those under
Feinberg’s oversight.
Feinberg’s Model
Feinberg says his pay reductions should serve as a model for the
rest of Wall Street. Poerio says banks such as Goldman Sachs
Group Inc. that repaid the government loans they got at the
height of the financial crisis are unlikely to follow Feinberg’s
lead and cut pay.
Creating proper incentives in pay plans is what regulators and
legislators should focus on, says former Representative Michael
Oxley, co-sponsor with Senator Paul Sarbanes of the 2002 law
that made management and corporate boards more accountable after
the frauds committed at Enron Corp. and WorldCom Inc. “They need
to get that right,” Oxley says. “It’s not as sexy to the public
but certainly a lot more workable.”
Bonuses paid to securities industry employees in New York City
peaked at $34.1 billion in 2006, according to New York State
Comptroller Thomas DiNapoli. The total was $18.4 billion in 2008
even as banks’ losses and their excessive leverage caused
governments worldwide to bail them out. Alan Johnson, a
compensation consultant in New York, expects Wall Street pay for
2009 to jump 40 percent to about $26 billion.
Bonuses are getting a boost from rising profit at the banks that
came through the credit crisis in the best condition. Goldman
Sachs is on a pace to almost match the record $20.1 billion in
compensation paid to its employees worldwide in 2007. Goldman
isn’t shy about paying for performance, says Jeanne Branthover,
a managing director at Boyden Global Executive Search Ltd.
“They’re taking the lead as far as, ‘We believe in our people;
we’ve done well; we’re going to stay the way we’ve always been
and not change,’” Branthover says.
‘Irresponsibility’
DiNapoli’s next report on financial industry bonuses may stir
new complaints. In January, a day after the release of the 2008
pay data, Obama called the payment of hefty banker bonuses
during a recession the “height of irresponsibility.” Senate
Banking Committee Chairman Christopher Dodd said at the time
that he would try to force executives to repay bonuses.
Still, aside from Feinberg’s plan, other efforts to address
banker pay are more in line with G-20 guidelines. The Federal
Reserve said on Oct. 22 that it will review practices at the 28
largest bank holding companies it regulates to ensure that pay
packages don’t encourage risky investments.
The five biggest banks in the U.K., including Barclays Plc and
Royal Bank of Scotland Group Plc, which is majority owned by the
government, agreed to follow the G-20 principles after meeting
with Chancellor of the Exchequer Alistair Darling in late
September.
John Gutfreund, former chairman of Salomon Brothers Inc., says
the pay restrictions being adopted fall short of what’s needed.
“The same excesses that took place before appear to be perfectly
well in place,” he says. “It’s too laissez-faire.” Checks on
risk taking that were in place until the late 1990s were more
sweeping and effective, he says.
Overpaid Baseball Players
Oxley, meanwhile, is pleased that the guidelines for most banks
stop short of capping pay. “I think the Yankees are overpaid,
too,” he says, referring to the New York team with the highest
payroll in Major League Baseball. “But I don’t want to pass a
law saying how much Derek Jeter can make playing shortstop.”
Banks outside Feinberg’s reach are mostly changing policies in
ways that fit the G-20 approach. New York-based Goldman Sachs is
paying a larger share of compensation in stock, with
restrictions on when the shares can be sold. Zurich-based Credit
Suisse Group AG said on Oct. 20 that it would increase salaries
for senior employees as a percentage of total pay. The plan also
provides for bonuses to be deferred for upto four years and tied
to company performance.
The debate over banker pay is pushing companies in the right
direction, says Robert Profusek, a partner at law firm Jones Day
in New York. Profusek, who advises on compensation issues, says
capping pay is the wrong approach. The government-mandated cuts
at Bank of America and Citigroup, meant to counter public
outrage over the cost of the bank bailouts, may prompt talented
bankers to leave, Profusek says. “We will be cutting off the
taxpayers’ noses to spite their faces,” he says.
With assistance from Christine Harper in New York. Ian Katz
covers financial regulation for Bloomberg News in Washington at
ikatz2@bloomberg.net