End of the Oil Age
Bill Reinert, an innovator of Toyota's gasoline-saving Prius, says
carmakers aren't moving fast enough to cope with global warming
and $100-a-barrel crude. Hybrids, plug-ins and electric-only
vehicles must take center stage to help the planet avoid
environmental and economic disaster.
By John Lippert and Alan Ohnsman
Bloomberg Markets March 2008
Bill Reinert, who helped design Toyota Motor Corp.'s Prius hybrid,
hovers in a helicopter 1,000 feet over Fort McMurray, Alberta. On
this clear November morning, he's craning for a look at one of the
world's largest petroleum reserves where there's not an oil well
in sight. Instead, in a 2-mile-wide pit below, trucks head to
refineries with loads of sand weighing more than Boeing 747s.
Yellow flames shoot skyward as 900-degree-Fahrenheit (482-degree-
Celsius) heat liquefies any embedded petroleum. Floating
scarecrows and propane-powered cannons do their best to chase
migrating birds from lethal wastewater ponds. Eventually, nuclear
reactors may surround the crater 270 miles (435 kilometers)
northeast of Edmonton, Alberta, delivering the power required to
wring oil from sand.
"This is what the end of the age of oil means," says Reinert, 60,
who plans the vehicles Toyota will make in a quarter century as
national manager for advanced technology at the U.S. sales unit in
Torrance, California. "The car-based culture, the business-as-
usual of building cars and trucks, is going to change
dramatically."
Since Henry Ford introduced the moving assembly line in 1913, the
world's automakers have relied on a single source of power--the
gasoline-dependent internal combustion engine. Today, the twin
threats of $100-a-barrel oil and global warming are convulsing an
industry addicted to cheap, abundant petroleum. Auto companies,
already hurt in 2007 by the lowest U.S. demand in a decade, are
struggling to perfect cars that run on ethanol, diesel, natural
gas, hydrogen and household electricity. They're under the gun
from California and more than a dozen other states to cut carbon
exhaust by 2020 with vehicles that must get 44 miles per gallon
(19 kilometers per liter) of gasoline, about double today's
average. On Dec. 19, President George W. Bush signed a law that
mandates fuel-efficiency of 35 mpg nationwide by that year.
Reinert says automakers are endangering themselves by basing sales
and profits on the big, fast cars that many U.S. customers say
they want in 2008. In five years, as oil shortages and global
warming intensify, car companies may be out of step with drivers'
demands for fuel-efficient vehicles. Even worse, degrading
stretches of the planet like Fort McMurray will only delay--not
prevent--the time when the world must function in a post-peak-
petroleum economy.
Canada's oil sands region may eventually provide a quarter of U.S.
crude oil demand, currently at 21.3 million barrels per day,
Reinert says. "At that point, the environmental impacts are
totally irreversible," he says. "You turn this area into an
ecological sacrifice zone."
Toyota investors, whose shares tumbled 27 percent to 5,630 yen in
the 12 months ended on Jan. 11, say the company's priority must be
weathering a weak U.S. market, not chasing breakthroughs in green
technology. Last year, U.S. sales declined 2.5 percent to 16.1
million vehicles industrywide. "There's cake, and there's
frosting," says Jeffrey Scharf, president of Santa Cruz,
California-based Scharf Investments, a fund firm that owns Toyota
stock among its $700 million in assets. "Hybrids are more into the
area of frosting."
Shareholder ambivalence about clean cars is only one hurdle to
surviving the end of easy oil. Reinert, a former Navy submariner
who stands 6 feet 1 inch (1.85 meters) tall, says he lies awake at
2:30 a.m. wondering whether he's making the right recommendations
for the future of Toyota--and the planet. His suggestions run from
building lightweight compacts and plug-in hybrids to redesigning
smog and people-choked cities and populating them with electric-
only cars.
Reinert says nobody can say for sure how the separate tailpipe
emission, fuel economy and manufacturing regulations promulgated
worldwide by multiple levels of government will affect the
environment. There's no blueprint for the impact of increasingly
scarce oil on a U.S. economy already laboring with a mortgage
crisis and a dropping dollar. Add industrialization in China and
India, and the number of cars and trucks worldwide may double to
2.1 billion by 2030, according to the Paris-based International
Energy Agency.
"We don't have a past, a history or a database that allows us to
explore the simultaneous impact of recessions, disruptions to the
energy supply and climate change," says Reinert, who spent six
years in the 1980s maintaining solar and wind-powered telephone
towers in Colorado's Rocky Mountains. "We don't have
the legislative, regulatory, financial or product planning tools."
Toyota is making excuses for not moving faster on fuel-efficiency,
says Daniel Becker, a Washington lawyer and former head of global
warming programs at environmental group Sierra Club. Since
Toyota's 2003 hit with the second-generation Prius, which gets as
much as 45 mpg in city driving, the company has slid backwards, he
says. In early 2004, Toyota and other carmakers refused to
negotiate with state legislators before California developed its
carbon restrictions. In December 2004, they sued to strip
California of its ability to enact its own limits, prompting
counterclaims that may end up in the U.S. Supreme Court. "People
like Bill Reinert understand the issues," Becker says. "That
hasn't stopped the company from turning to large trucks and SUVs
to boost sales."
Reinert defends toyota's need for sport utility vehicles,
minivans and pickups, which contributed 42 percent of its 2.6
million U.S. vehicle sales in 2007. The company earns about $6,000
before taxes in the U.S. on an SUV. That compares with a $1,000
profit on a Corolla and a small loss on a Prius, says David Healy,
an analyst at New York-based Burnham Securities Inc. The Toyota
City, Japan-based company made ?450.9 billion ($4.1 billion) in
the three months ended on Sept. 30 compared with ?405.7 billion a
year earlier. Sales rose 11.3 percent to ?6.49 trillion.
"Without these profits, where does the investment capital come
from for our research on plug-ins or fuel cells?" Reinert asks.
Yet he fears Toyota and other carmakers may be too bureaucratic
and profit driven to prepare for the energy-constrained future.
Toyota's U.S. sales headquarters employed 400 people when Reinert
was hired in 1990; today, 8,000 work there, and the U.S. is
Toyota's most profitable market.
"There's a tension between pickups and hybrids within Toyota,"
says David Schearer, chief scientist for California Environmental
Associates and a consultant on the Prius. "They want to do the
right thing, but the Prius is a relatively small piece in terms of
overall sales volume." Prius sales totaled 181,221 in the U.S.
last year compared with 30,000 in Toyota's original forecast when
the car went on sale in 1997.
Toyota may have become the world's largest automaker in 2007,
building 9.51 million cars and trucks versus an estimated 9.26
million for General Motors Corp. The U.S. automaker planned to
announce final results on Jan. 23. Given Toyota's craving for
growth and profits, Reinert says he feels like a 21st-century
Cassandra, endowed with the gift of prophecy about the oil-related
crises to come but fated not to be believed.
The environmental desecration at Fort McMurray and the dangers in
petroleum-rich countries such as Iraq and Saudi Arabia show why
it's foolish to brush off warnings about an energy-depleted
future, says Jan Kreider, an engineering professor at the
University of Colorado at Boulder who had Reinert as a graduate
student. "We're going to have to have crisis on top of crisis
before energy policies change," he says. "Americans have this
shock mentality where they do what they want to do for as long as
they can and then set up massive programs to fix everything in a
few years."
So far, Americans are embracing small steps such as switching to
fluorescent light bulbs. Meanwhile, at Fort McMurray's pit mines,
it takes 2 tons of sand, 250 gallons (947 liters) of water and
1,400 cubic feet (39.6 cubic meters) of natural gas to produce one
barrel of synthetic crude, says Peter Wells, director of research
firm Neftex Petroleum Consultants Ltd. in Abingdon, England.
That's enough water for a day's use for a U.S. family of four and
enough natural gas for 5.6 days. The gas is burned to power a
process that extracts a tarry substance called bitumen from the
sand and then refines it into synthetic crude.
In turn, each barrel generates as much as 110 kilograms (240
pounds) of carbon dioxide equivalents, the same as refining three
barrels of traditional light crude.
"When you're schlepping around two tons of sand for a barrel of
crude, it shows that conventional oil is already well into
depletion," says Jeffrey Rubin, chief economist at CIBC World
Markets Inc. in Toronto. "Price will ultimately ration demand.
People won't be able to afford to drive."
Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers Vice President Greg
Stringham generally agrees with Wells's numbers. He says each
barrel of synthetic crude requires only 900 cubic feet of natural
gas and puts out about 96 kilograms of carbon dioxide equivalents.
"It's definitely true that the era of cheap and easy oil is
over,'' says Brad Bellows, spokesman for Suncor Energy Inc., which
opened Fort McMurray's first commercial oil sands mine in 1967.
"Industry is looking offshore and to unconventional sources like
oil sands."
Oil sands facility operators are working to minimize environmental
harm by recycling water faster and using the refining process to
produce heat that's now generated with gas, Stringham says.
They're also trying to sequester carbon dioxide emissions
underground and quickly restore land to its original condition.
Wells predicts world oil production will peak at about 100 million
barrels a day in about a decade. By 2030, output will fall to
today's level of 87 million barrels. Declining production will
collide with rising demand, which could hit 118 million barrels a
day by 2030 if trends were to continue, the U.S. Energy
Information Administration forecasts. "When production levels off,
if the price is $200 or $300 a barrel, then that's what people
will pay," Wells says.
Reinert says that although oil may drop in price because of a
global recession, it's likely to gyrate between $75 and $125 a
barrel for the next five years. Crude oil for February delivery
traded at $92.51 a barrel on the New York Mercantile Exchange on
Jan. 11. It hit $100 for the first time on Jan. 2. "Peter's
scenarios for future energy are the ones I embrace," Reinert says.
Toyota's rivals are struggling with the same predictions. "The
biggest risk is the risk of a recession, of a shock to the global
economy," says Larry Burns, vice president of research and
development at General Motors Corp. "The second risk is China.
China's growth is unbelievable, and it depends on energy. In every
country that's providing China with commodities, you're seeing
record years in car sales."
GM plans to sell 16 models of gas-electric hybrids in North
America by 2011. One of these, a Silverado pickup, gets 40 percent
better fuel economy in city driving than the gasoline version,
which gets 15 mpg.
At Nissan Motor Co., 25 percent of sales in five years may come
from electric cars, hybrids and clean-burning diesels,up from 5
percent today, Chief Executive Officer Carlos Ghosn says. "I don't
consider climate change or oil prices as a threat," he says. "I
consider it an opportunity."
In an industry first, Honda Motor Co. will start leasing its
Clarity fuel-cell car in California this year. Fuel cells create
electricity in a chemical process that combines hydrogen and
oxygen, with water vapor as the only byproduct. The Clarity has a
top speed of 100 miles an hour, a range of 270 miles and lease
payments of $600 a month.
Such advances may not come soon enough, says Reinert, who counts
Toyota Executive Technical Adviser Norihiko Nakamura as an ally
who shares his urgency. Nakamura, one of a handful of occupants on
the top floor of Toyota's Higashi Fuji Technical Center near Mt.
Fuji, says he worries the world's oceans could get so hot that
they'll release carbon instead of storing it--with catastrophic
consequences for human life. Nakamura takes his own measurements
of atmospheric pollution and is scouring the world for alternative
fuels. He's targeting hydrogen, electricity or ammonia as
replacements for petroleum to ensure that auto, aircraft and ship
builders remain viable for another century.
"Oil and natural gas are getting scarce, and there's global
warming, so we need something that's carbon free," says Nakamura,
65, whose white hair almost reaches his shoulders. "Toyota has a
sense of crisis that there are only several years left to do
something about this."
The United Nations' Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change,
which shared the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize with former U.S. Vice
President Al Gore, says carbon emissions must peak in 2015 to
avoid irreversible climate shifts. In its November 2007 report,
the panel concluded that emissions of greenhouse gases at or above
current rates will cause changes in the 21st century that are
likely to be larger than those in the 20th century. Among them are
probable increases in heat waves, heavy precipitation and
cyclones; reduction in the size of areas covered by snow; and a
decrease in Arctic sea ice.
Reinert says that without action, oil may become so expensive that
the world would resemble the one in Blade Runner. In the 1982
film, the rich live hundreds of stories high and the poor walk
dark, rain-soaked streets. Or the lack of oil may cause the
breakdown of social order depicted in the 1979 movie Mad Max.
Reinert says Fort McMurray provides a window into such fictional
portrayals. He predicts that the clamor for energy security will
trump all environmental concerns worldwide. And he forecasts that
most alternatives to conventional petroleum, such as oil sands and
ethanol, will make climate change and water shortages worse.
Signs of indelible change already are emerging at Fort McMurray,
whose soil was saturated with petroleum when landmasses collided
to form the Rocky Mountains millions of years ago. Oil-related
development has displaced 330 square kilometers (127 square miles)
of previously untouched forest rich with spruce trees and peat
bogs. The population has doubled to 64,441 in 10 years, with
another 20,000 people living in mining and construction camps.
Refineries, mines and so-called in situ extraction, in which
underground oil sands are melted with high-pressure steam or set
afire, have drawn investments totaling 155.6 billion Canadian
dollars (US$152.6 billion) since 1997.
"It's an enterprise of epic proportions, akin to building the
pyramids or China's Great Wall," Canadian Prime Minister Stephen
Harper said at a Canada-United Kingdom Chamber of Commerce meeting
in London last year.
In total, 175 billion barrels of recoverable oil exist in an area
the size of Florida, Stringham says. That compares with 259
billion barrels in Saudi Arabia. "It won't be a lack of resources
that causes a shift away from oil," Stringham says. "There's lots
of oil."
Daily output of oil from Fort McMurray may reach 6 million barrels
by 2050, up from 1.2 million last year, Wells says. Some of the
natural gas to fuel production could come from the proposed $16
billion Mackenzie Valley Pipeline running 800 miles from Alberta
north to the Beaufort Sea. Today, most of Fort McMurray's oil is
transformed into gasoline, diesel and jet fuel in a network of
refineries stretching to Edmonton, Denver, Chicago and Houston.
Reinert says it's not too late to mitigate the environmental toll
of such development. Part of the answer lies in more Corolla-style
compacts with light materials and four-cylinder engines. Part lies
in hybrids such as the Prius and the Camry. Governments and
corporations will have to get better at setting priorities. Carbon
emissions from buildings can be reduced for $50 a ton with
measures like insulation. In comparison, it costs $2,000 a ton to
cut carbon tailpipe emissions by redesigning cars, he says. Cities
must be redesigned too. People need to rely on mass transit and
live closer to where they work. "In a place like New York, there
may not be a role for our traditional product--I don't mean today
but 20 or 30 years from now," he says.
Right now, Reinert's main job is designing the features that will
attract customers to plug-in hybrids. In the prototype stage,
plug-ins resemble the Prius with a small door on their side for
hooking to an electrical outlet. "The transportation sector
worldwide is 95 percent dependent on liquid hydrocarbons," says
Gary Kendall, a World Wildlife Fund energy analyst in Brussels.
"The way to reduce this dependence is with a grid-connected
vehicle." Electricity from nuclear power could be sent directly to
the vehicles instead of digging up oil sands to produce liquid
fuel, he says.
"I'm confident there will be an industry-leading plug-in from
Toyota," Reinert says. The company plans to start leasing plug-ins
to global fleet customers by 2010, he says. Plug-ins can't arrive
sooner because Toyota hasn't figured out how to mass-produce
lithium-ion batteries that are affordable, durable and powerful
enough for cars, Toyota President Katsuaki Watanabe said in
Detroit on Jan. 14.
Kendall says the company can work faster. "Toyota could bring
plug-ins to market very quickly, but perhaps it'snot in their
business interest," he says. "They're milking the technological
edge they have now with the Prius."
The delay in consumer sales until after 2010 means Toyota must
endure taunts from GM Vice Chairman Robert Lutz. He told reporters
at the Los Angeles auto show in November that his company will
test-drive plug-ins in March 2008 and mass-produce them in
November 2010. "We'll find out who is right--and whose credibility
takes a serious dent," Lutz said.
Menahem anderman, president of Advanced Automotive Batteries, a
consulting firm in Oregon House, California, predicts Toyota will
introduce plug-ins first. Toyota spent $7.7 billion on research
and development in 2006, the most of any public company surveyed
worldwide by Booz Allen Hamilton Inc., a New York-based management
consulting firm. To move beyond automakers' lead-acid and nickel-
metal batteries, Toyota has as many as 300 in-house engineers
studying the chemistry of lithium batteries, Anderman says.
GM has no in-house researchers for lithium chemistry, relying
instead on suppliers, according to Joseph LoGrasso, GM's
engineering group manager for plug-ins. GM spent $6.6 billion on
research in 2006.
For all of the recent research, the Prius may still be the world's
cleanest car. During its lifetime, it emits 110,000 pounds of
carbon dioxide equivalents, including the amount put out during
manufacturing, says Kreider, the Colorado professor. That compares
with 180,000 pounds for a Camry and 310,000 pounds for a Tundra
pickup.
"Toyota's leading position in the hybrid arena remains one of
their key competitive advantages, especially given the recent
high-oil-price environment," says Wendy Trevisani, who manages
Santa Fe, New Mexico-based Thornburg Investment Management Inc.'s
$17.4 billion International Value Fund. As of July, the fund held
8 million Toyota shares.
Some new Toyota vehicles are less friendly to the environment. The
2009 Corolla with a 1.8-liter engine is 193 pounds heavier than
its predecessor, with just a 1-mpg improvement in highway fuel
economy. The Lexus RX400h hybrid SUV gets 24 mpg on the highway, 2
miles more than the gas-only version, and, at $42,689, costs 10
percent more. "We're focused on increasing our profits, and the
U.S. is key," Reinert says. "This necessarily limits some of the
options we might have pursued, especially as we move toward being
a volume manufacturer, and especially in a down market."
If Reinert is sure of anything, it's that Toyota can't go into
reverse. Since 1950, the world has been blessed with an eightfold
increase in oil production. Yet the peak discoveries for new oil
came in 1962, petroleum consultant Wells says. Total production
outside the former Soviet Union and the Organization of Petroleum
Exporting Countries topped out two years ago, he says. Oil in the
former Soviet Union will reach its highest level in about five
years; OPEC will peak in about 10, he says.
In the interim, nations will be more dependent on the Middle East,
where getting oil is complicated by war, political turmoil and
declining output from mature wells. "After a series of incidents
in the Persian Gulf, or a low-level nuclear exchange that shuts
off oil supplies, you wouldn't have a short-term disruption like
Katrina," Reinert says. "You would have a profound one- or two- or
three-year period in which economies and governments fail."
Even when he's delivering dire assessments, Reinert speaks in the
easygoing tones of a popular college professor. His interest in
science came in fits and starts. During the early 1950s, when he
was growing up in Parcoal, West Virginia, he was poor enough to
see running water and a telephone installed in his house. He moved
to Kansas City, Missouri, after his mother, who'd been divorced,
married a Ford Motor Co. assembly line worker. Instead of
following his buddies to Vietnam after high school, Reinert joined
the Navy and ran engine rooms in nuclear submarines under the
polar ice cap.
Reinert says his life fell apart after the Navy. His darkest day
came while he was working at the Ford plant. He was put in
shackles in front of his stepfather's friends for buying $6 worth
of marijuana. After three weeks in jail, he enrolled in the
University of Colorado and got a bachelor's degree in
biopsychology. In 1979, when the fall of Iran's Shah Mohammed Reza
Pahlavi sparked an oil crisis, he joined the university's master's
program in energy engineering.
Reinert graduated and was hired by Kreider. His job was to attach
solar panels and windmills to microwave telephone towers that were
otherwise dependent on diesel fuel airlifted into the Rockies. He
became a pioneer in so-called power electronics, coordinating
electricity from wind and the sun with a battery and diesel
engine. He maintained the towers via helicopters based in Grand
Junction, Colorado. The flights took him over the Piceance Basin,
a 1,200-square-mile area atop natural gas deposits and as many as
1.1 trillion barrels of recoverable oil embedded in shale.
Reinert joined Toyota to run energy operations at the California
sales headquarters in 1990. He spent eight years badgering top
brass to let him use power electronics to design cars. He helped
imbue the Prius with a hatchback and fold-down back seats for
maximum cargo space and acceleration of 0-60 miles per hour in
10.4 seconds--4 seconds faster than its predecessor.
Reinert won the assignment of chauffeuring actress Charlize Theron
in 2004 on the night she won an Oscar for Monster. He remembers
how she hugged her mother when paparazzi pounded on their fuel
cell-powered SUV. The Prius earned Reinert the right to speak on
environmental trends inside Toyota and to outside groups. "Having
a voice that may not be the company line is ultimately good for
Toyota," says Jim Lentz, president of Toyota's U.S. sales unit.
Reinert believes in changing individual behavior. After the oil
tanker Rebecca sank off the Galápagos Islands in 2001, he, Toyota
and the World Wildlife Fund joined Ecuador in a multiyear cleanup.
They designed an oil delivery dock to replace the leaking
structure built during World War II. They set up recycling centers
for motor oil that would otherwise be dumped into the ocean and
household trash that would be burned. "We could actually make a
measurable difference in a geographically defined area," Reinert
says.
There's evidence in his personal life that such efforts may not be
enough. Reinert and his wife, Pam, can't walk their dogs around
their home in Rancho Santa Margarita, California, because forest
fires exacerbated by drought and global warming are driving
coyotes down from the nearby Saddleback Mountains.
When reinert lies awake, he worries about the Piceance Basin,
where he put his life back together after doing jail time and
learned to be a hands-on scientist. Petroleum hovering around $100
a barrel is rekindling the 1970s oil shale boom. Roads and tunnels
are snaking into the mesas around Grand Junction; natural gas
derricks dot the horizon. Shell Oil Co. is testing ways to heat
underground shale to 400 degrees Celsius and capture the melted
oil inside rock frozen solid by pumped-in refrigerants. Daily
output of synthetic crude from Colorado, Utah and Wyoming may
reach 1 million barrels a day by 2040, Wells says.
Flying over the Piceance in a Cessna 182 in November, Reinert
searches for the bald eagles, wild horses and elk he knew in his
youth. He can't find any. He studies the creeks that used to feed
the Colorado River from melting snowpacks and finds them dry. The
river, which would nourish oil shale extraction and the growing
populations in Las Vegas, Los Angeles and Phoenix, is narrower
than the I-70 freeway alongside it. Strip mines cut straight down
into solid rock even after 30 years of reclamation. Another oil
shale boom would further deface the Piceance. "I feel an abject
sense of hopelessness that I can't do anything to stop this," he
says. "I feel like I've lost part of myself, like something's been
amputated."
Toyota's technical triumph with the petroleum-saving Prius shows
carmakers can be a force in mitigating the environmental damage
Reinert worries about. He says that's only a start. As threats
from the end of easy oil multiply and global warming accelerates,
the desecrated forests and scarred earth at Fort McMurray may be
harbingers of what's to come if automakers and politicians fail to
act.
John Lippert is chief of the Detroit bureau of Bloomberg News.
jlippert@bloomberg.net
Alan Ohnsman covers transportation in Los Angeles.
aohnsman@bloomberg.net
With reporting by Naoko Fujimura in Tokyo, Jeff Green in Detroit
and Ian McKinnon in Edmonton.
#<532782.18602.1.0.69.26862.25>#
-0- Feb/01/2008 20:20 GMT