Exxon Looks to U.S. Shale Fields to Drive Global Growth

Exxon Mobil Corp. Chief Executive Officer Rex Tillerson
Exxon Mobil Corp. Chief Executive Officer Rex Tillerson said, North American shale “is more resilient than some people think it is.” Photographer: Andrey Rudakov/Bloomberg

In a world of $55 a barrel oil, Exxon Mobil Corp. is relying on shale fields in Texas, Oklahoma and North Dakota to help fund the next wave of big overseas projects it needs to thrive in the future.

Exxon unveiled plans Wednesday to double the amount of oil it pumps from U.S. shale fields during the next three years, even as it moves more cautiously on investments in big projects elsewhere. Decades after quitting many U.S. fields to pursue bigger reserves from the Middle East to the North Sea, Exxon now sees its U.S. assets as its most reliable cash engines.

With its leading technology, expertise and market clout, the biggest U.S. oil producer has been able to reduce costs and improve efficiency in domestic shale fields it began acquiring in 2010. That progress, coming even as the price of crude has dropped, has allowed Exxon to generate “attractive returns,” said Chief Executive Officer Rex Tillerson.

“It might surprise some people how attractive some of these things are in this environment,” Tillerson told a gathering of investors in New York Wednesday. North American shale “is more resilient than some people think it is.”

Exxon expects its worldwide production of crude and natural gas to climb 7.5 percent to the equivalent of 4.3 million barrels a day by the end of 2017, the Irving, Texas-based company said. The last time Exxon performed at that level was 2011.

America Rising

The U.S. contribution to Exxon supplies has been nudging higher for the last few years amid Tillerson’s renewed focus on domestic assets in shale and other so-called tight rock resources that require intensive drilling and fracturing techniques.

U.S. wells accounted for 22 percent of Exxon’s crude output last year, up from 15 percent in 2008. The supply bump from Exxon’s domestic, onshore fields during the next three years will be driven by drilling in West Texas, North Dakota and southern Oklahoma, according to the company.

A “significant portion” of U.S. shale fields are competitive with overseas oil projects at current prices, Tillerson said, thanks to more efficient production techniques and cost cutting. His statement contradicts many analysts who had predicted most shale wells would become money losers as crude fell below $75 a barrel.

Tillerson’s remarks on Wednesday “suggested to us that an opportunistic acquisition is increasingly likely, particularly if low prices persist into 2016,” a team of analysts led by Paul Sankey at Wolfe Research LLC said in a note to clients.

“Our assumption is that the top target for a deal would include U.S. unconventional, led by the big three plays where they already have scale and learning: Bakken, Permian and Woodford/Ardmore,” the Wolfe team wrote.

Shale Operators

The “key potential targets” with strong positions in those regions include Hess Corp., Continental Resources Inc., Apache Corp., Devon Energy Corp. and Anadarko Petroleum Corp., Sankey’s team wrote.

EOG Resources Inc. and Occidental Petroleum Corp. would also be good candidates, though they may be too expensive, the Wolfe analysts said. Pioneer Natural Resources Co. and Denbury Resources Inc. may also attract Exxon’s attention, they wrote.

The solid returns offered by U.S. shale gives Exxon more flexibility to defer investment in bigger projects until market conditions improve, Tillerson said. A nine-month rout in global crude prices is spurring oil companies to postpone or cancel exploration projects to conserve cash.

For Exxon, a fresh injection of shale oil couldn’t come at a better time: the company’s fourth-quarter output fell to the lowest for that period since it acquired Mobil Corp. in 1999. And its exploration failure rate worsened to 39 percent in 2014 from 33 percent a year earlier.

Sanctions Hit

Exxon has about $1 billion tied up in a Russian joint venture with Rosneft OAO that’s been left in suspended animation after U.S. and European Union sanctions forbade investment in that nation’s Arctic, shale and deep-sea oil sectors. Russia surpassed the U.S. to become Exxon’s biggest exploratory prospect last year.

Exxon is sticking to production targets established when oil traded for more than $100 a barrel, signaling confidence that demand for crude-based fuels will continue to expand.

The company plans to increase output by 2 percent this year and 3 percent annually in 2016 and 2017, according to a presentation that accompanied Tillerson’s remarks. The outlook assumes an average crude price of $55 a barrel.

Little Changed

The forecast is little changed from Exxon’s outlook a year ago. At the time, Brent crude, the benchmark for international oil sales, traded for about $108 a barrel. The price has since fallen about 44 percent as global supplies grew faster than consumption, an imbalance Tillerson suggested may not change any time soon.

“There’s a lot of supply out there and I don’t see a particularly healthy economy,” Tillerson said. “My opinion is, people have to kind of settle in for a while, and I can’t tell you how long that’s going to be.”

Crude output from U.S. shale fields probably won’t decline much, if at all, in response to tumbling oil prices, said Tillerson, who entered his 10th year as CEO in January. Politically volatile regions such as Libya and Iraq will add to the global glut as conditions improve, putting additional pressure on prices, he said.

Production growth will be driven by oil and so-called gas liquids such as propane, which will increase by 7 percent this year and 4 percent annually in 2016 and 2017, according to the presentation. Natural gas output will drop 2 percent annually this year and next before rising 4 percent in 2017, according to the presentation.

Exxon fell 0.5 percent to $86.74 at the close in New York. The shares are down 7.5 percent in the past year.

Before it's here, it's on the Bloomberg Terminal. LEARN MORE