Aug. 1 (Bloomberg) -- Procter & Gamble Co., the world’s largest consumer-products company, plans to sell, discontinue or otherwise eliminate as many as 100 brands in the next two years to cut costs and focus on its most important product lines. The shares rose the most in two months.
The 70 to 80 brands that will remain have accounted for 90 percent of the company’s sales and more than 95 percent of its profit in the past three years, Chief Executive Officer A.G. Lafley said today on a conference call to discuss fourth-quarter earnings, which beat analysts’ estimates.
Lafley has said he was reevaluating the company’s portfolio of brands and had already started to narrow P&G’s focus since returning as CEO last year. So far his most notable move was agreeing to sell most of P&G’s pet-food operations, including Iams and Eukanuba, for $2.9 billion earlier this year. The company’s top brands include Tide detergents, Pampers diapers, Crest toothpaste and Gillette razors.
“This will be a much smaller and less complicated company of brands that will be easier to operate,” Lafley said on the call. The strategy will lead to a “significant rationalization” of product items and a more “significant pruning” of unproductive selling units, he said.
Lafley, speaking later in a interview, declined to identify which brands the company is planning to let go in order to avoid a “fire sale.” Some deals already are in the works, and while the company isn’t changing the four main sectors it sells in -- household products, paper goods, beauty and grooming -- it would consider a deal for a larger name, he said.
“We will sell a billion dollar-plus brand if it is no longer strategic,” Lafley said. “We are not selling flies on the tail of a dog.”
Among the brands P&G may sell are Ausonia, Discreet, Blend-a-Dent, Braun Oral-B and Rindex, all of which have less than $100 million in sales each, according to Ali Dibadj, an analyst at Sanford C. Bernstein & Co. in New York.
P&G shares rose 3 percent to $79.65 at the close in New York, the biggest gain since May 24. The Cincinnati-based company has slid 2.2 percent this year, compared with a 4.2 percent gain for the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index.
The company’s remaining brands will be organized into a dozen business units in the four sectors, Lafley said. Most of the brands P&G is keeping are leaders in their industries or categories: 23 have sales of $1 billion to $10 billion, and most of the remainder have sales of $100 million to $500 million, he said.
Marketing, research and development, manufacturing and the company’s supply chain all will benefit from having fewer brands on which to focus, Lafley said.
The positive changes the company has made, including improving its innovation and cutting costs, have yet to significantly improve its “mediocre” earnings, Bernstein’s Dibadj said today in an e-mail. The brand-trimming plan may not be enough, and the company needs to evaluate whether its current conglomerate structure is the right one, he said.
“This is a miniscule step in the right direction, but in the end is just an excuse for them to ride out a tough macro and allow them to cut massively more costs,” he said.
Dibadj has the equivalent of a buy recommendation on the shares.
Fourth-quarter profit excluding items such as restructuring expenses was 95 cents a share, the company said today in a statement. That topped the 91-cent average estimate of projections compiled by Bloomberg.
Sales declined 1 percent to $20.2 billion in the period ended June 30. Analysts projected $20.5 billion, the average of 20 estimates compiled by Bloomberg.
Organic sales, which exclude the effects of acquisitions, divestitures and foreign-exchange rate fluctuations, rose 4 percent in fabric and home care as well as in baby and feminine care. Sales on that basis were little changed in beauty products.
For the current year, the company forecast profit growth in the “mid-single” digits in percentage terms. Organic sales will grow in the “low-to-mid single” digits, it said.
To contact the reporter on this story: Cotten Timberlake in Washington at email@example.com
To contact the editors responsible for this story: Kevin Orland at firstname.lastname@example.org Niamh Ring