Bloomberg the Company & Products

Bloomberg Anywhere Login


Connecting decision makers to a dynamic network of information, people and ideas, Bloomberg quickly and accurately delivers business and financial information, news and insight around the world.


Financial Products

Enterprise Products


Customer Support

  • Americas

    +1 212 318 2000

  • Europe, Middle East, & Africa

    +44 20 7330 7500

  • Asia Pacific

    +65 6212 1000


Industry Products

Media Services

Follow Us

Goldman Says Keeping U.S. Oil-Export Ban Helps Economy

Goldman Says Keep Oil-Export Ban to Add Value to Economy
Rising production from shale formations has allowed the U.S., the world’s biggest oil consumer, to import less crude, fueling speculation that the curb on exports could be lifted. Photographer: Eddie Seal/Bloomberg

June 11 (Bloomberg) -- A four-decade-old U.S. ban on crude exports should remain until a “saturation” point when domestic refining capacity can’t absorb increased oil production, according to Goldman Sachs Group Inc.

Maintaining the statutory curb on shipments overseas will deliver the “highest value” to the U.S. economy, the bank said in an e-mailed report today. At current extraction costs, the export ban may start to weigh on U.S. output growth in coming years, it predicted.

“The Goldman view is very credible,” said Sarah Emerson, managing principal of ESAI Energy Inc. in Wakefield, Massachusetts. “Refiners are processing increasing output here and that’s a greater benefit to the economy.”

Rising production from shale formations has allowed the U.S., the world’s biggest oil consumer, to import less crude, fueling speculation that the curb on exports could be lifted. A 1975 federal law bans most shipments overseas, with only deliveries of refined products including gasoline and diesel allowed. Supporters of the ban say keeping U.S.-produced oil at home helps reduce fuel prices for industry and consumers.

‘Optimal Decision’

“Keeping the ban in place would be the optimal decision until saturation is reached to maximize the contribution of the refining sector,” said Damien Courvalin, a Goldman analyst in New York. “Once saturation is reached, it would then be optimal to lift the ban as value added from higher production outperforms value added from the refining sectors.”

Uncertainty over the future of the ban is probably delaying investment in U.S. refining capacity, according to Goldman. Oil companies are seeking ways around it by using simple, one-step plants capable of turning crude into products for exports. BP Plc signed on to take at least 80 percent of the capacity of a new $360 million mini-refinery in Houston that will process just enough to escape the restrictions.

IHS Inc. last month said the ban should be lifted because the U.S. will benefit from higher oil production and reduced gasoline prices. The nation may save an average of $67 billion a year from its import bill in 2016 and add 964,000 jobs by 2018, according to the Colorado-based consultant.

‘Premature’ Urgency

“The urgency of the debate has been premature,” Emerson said. “We aren’t at the saturation point and won’t be for a long time because there are a bunch of ways refiners are able to transform these molecules and make products for export.”

U.S. crude production rose 77,000 barrels a day to 8.46 million last week, the Energy Information Administration said today. Output reached 8.47 million barrels a day in the week ended May 23, the most since October 1986, according to the EIA, the Energy Department’s statistical arm.

To contact the reporters on this story: Heesu Lee in Seoul at; Mark Shenk in New York at

To contact the editors responsible for this story: Pratish Narayanan at David Marino, Stephen Cunningham

Please upgrade your Browser

Your browser is out-of-date. Please download one of these excellent browsers:

Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Opera or Internet Explorer.