April 30 (Bloomberg) -- Orbital Sciences Corp. looked like an also-ran in the space race about two years ago, eclipsed by billionaire Elon Musk’s startup venture.
Orbital was trading near its five-year low while Musk’s closely held Space Exploration Technologies Corp., or SpaceX, made history in May 2012 by docking a cargo ship at the International Space Station.
Yesterday, Orbital’s stock soared on plans to combine with Alliant Techsystems Inc.’s aerospace and defense businesses, tripling revenue and uniting two longtime launch partners. Alliant helps power the Antares rocket, key to Orbital’s growth in the estimated $7 billion market for building and launching midsized satellites and spacecraft.
“We’re still not going to be a $30 billion-level company, but we’ll be well-positioned in bringing the right combination of innovation and affordability,” David W. Thompson, chairman and chief executive officer of Orbital, said in a phone interview after the announcement yesterday.
Thompson, 60, will be CEO of the new company, created by the year’s end in a $5 billion, all-stock deal. Orbital surged 17 percent yesterday to close at $30.96 in New York, the biggest gain in more than 11 years. The shares, which sank to a five-year low in June 2012, have risen 75 percent in the past year, reflecting the company’s success in reaching the space station.
Unlike SpaceX, Orbital has no plans to jump into the riskier businesses of ferrying astronauts to the station or launching big military and spy satellites.
“There’s the Goldilocks effect here,” Thompson said earlier this month at the company’s headquarters in Dulles, Virginia. “You can fail by not reaching far enough, and you can also sometimes stumble by reaching too far.”
Orbital officials expect to boost sales in an austere federal budget environment in part by focusing on midsized missions, which include the flights to the space station under a National Aeronautics and Space Administration contract.
The midsized missions accounted for roughly $350 million, or more than a quarter of Orbital’s sales last year. By the end of the decade, they may generate $1 billion, Thompson said.
Thompson said he doesn’t regret losing the opportunity to develop a commercial crew program for NASA. The agency instead has funded efforts by several companies to develop spacecraft capable of carrying astronauts -- including SpaceX, Boeing Co. and Blue Origin LLC, a Kent, Washington-based company founded by Jeff Bezos, CEO of Amazon.com Inc.
“In retrospect, I think it’s actually probably been a good thing,” Thompson said. “It’s allowed us to really focus within the human spaceflight market on the cargo program and make sure we’re doing a good thing there without also pulling resources away from our communications satellites and our military work.”
Orbital didn’t meet the criteria to compete for the large Pentagon satellite launches, said Barron Beneski, a company spokesman. A joint venture of Lockheed Martin Corp. and Boeing dominates that $70 billion market, and Hawthorne, California-based SpaceX on April 28 sued the military to try to break into the business.
Thompson’s focus is on the Antares rocket, which at 132 feet is as tall as a 13-story building and carries medium-sized payloads of up to 14,000 pounds to low-Earth orbit. Antares successfully launched the Cygnus craft to the space station in September 2013 under a demonstration flight. The vehicle made its first official supply run in January 2014.
ATK’s propulsion systems power the second stage of the Antares rocket, and they also may eventually be used for the first stage, eliminating the need to use Russian-built engines. The U.S. has imposed sanctions on Russia for its seizure of Crimea in Ukraine.
Orbital’s next launch to the space station is June 6. The cargo deliveries are part of a $1.9 billion contract for eight resupply missions to the space station.
NASA is considering extending the contract for as long as two years, the agency said. Thompson told investors during an April 17 conference call that an extension might mean as many as four additional supply missions.
Orbital has the benefit of launching Antares from NASA’s Wallops Flight Facility on Virginia’s Eastern Shore. It has virtually unlimited access to the launch pad, a concrete structure extending 22 feet above the adjacent beach, while its competitors must wait for open dates at other locations.
The Virginia Commercial Space Flight Authority built the launch pad after Orbital agreed to launch the rocket from Wallops.
“Wallops is kind of sized in the same way we are,” Thompson said. “It’s a good fit for the kind of things we do.”
Thompson said Antares could be the logical successor to the Delta II rocket that now launches military and NASA satellites. The Lockheed-Boeing venture, United Launch Alliance LLC, discontinued the Delta II after the Air Force, its primary customer, said it would stop buying it because it was too small for newer satellites.
Antares may be a cost-effective successor, said Bruce Underwood, a NASA deputy director, in an interview.
“What we’d have is a NASA-built satellite launching on an Orbital rocket from a NASA launch range,” said Underwood, who has an Antares model in his Wallops office.
The Air Force is looking at using smaller satellites, which would “drive a market for smaller launch vehicles, significantly reducing the overall cost of acquiring additional space capabilities,” said Connie Dillon, a spokeswoman.
Antares’ success contrasts with Orbital’s back-to-back failures in 2009 and 2011 -- when a predecessor rocket failed to place two NASA satellites into orbit. The agency absorbed most of the $700 million loss. They were Orbital’s only failures in a decade of almost 250 launches.
Orbital had $1.4 billion in sales last year, while Alliant’s aerospace and defense groups generated $3.1 billion in revenue.
The new company, which will be called Orbital ATK Inc., combines Orbital’s missile-defense systems and ATK’s tactical missiles. From ATK will also come its expertise in ammunition for the U.S. military. ATK’s other business, including its commercial ammunition and rifles, will be a separate company.
The merger isn’t a departure from Orbital’s conservative approach to business, said Chris Quilty, an analyst with Raymond James & Associates in St. Petersburg, Florida, which, when affiliates are included, owns more than 1 percent of the company’s shares.
ATK and Orbital have worked together for 25 years and have similar corporate cultures, said Quilty, who has described Thompson as somewhat of an “anti-Elon Musk.”
“Among the range of strategic moves that a company could make, I would consider this in a cautious bucket,” Quilty said.
To contact the reporter on this story: Jonathan D. Salant in Washington at email@example.com
To contact the editors responsible for this story: Stephanie Stoughton at firstname.lastname@example.org Mark McQuillan, Romaine Bostick