Bloomberg Anywhere Login

Bloomberg

Connecting decision makers to a dynamic network of information, people and ideas, Bloomberg quickly and accurately delivers business and financial information, news and insight around the world.

Company

Financial Products

Enterprise Products

Media

Customer Support

  • Americas

    +1 212 318 2000

  • Europe, Middle East, & Africa

    +44 20 7330 7500

  • Asia Pacific

    +65 6212 1000

Communications

Industry Products

Media Services

Follow Us

Arizona Limit on Non-Surgical Abortion Allowed by Judge

People hold up signs during a women's pro-choice rally on Capitol Hill, in Washington, D.C. Photographer: Mark Wilson/Getty Images
People hold up signs during a women's pro-choice rally on Capitol Hill, in Washington, D.C. Photographer: Mark Wilson/Getty Images

April 1 (Bloomberg) -- An Arizona law limiting women’s access to drug-induced abortions took effect today after a judge refused to block a 2012 overhaul of abortion regulations that opponents called the most extreme in the nation.

U.S. District Judge David Bury in Tucson yesterday denied a request by Planned Parenthood to halt implementation of the law, which prohibits medicinal abortions in the eighth and ninth week of pregnancy, including use of the RU-486 pill, until its constitutionality has been resolved.

The measure is one of more than 200 abortion restrictions passed nationwide since a Republican-led push in state legislatures began in 2011. More state abortion restrictions were passed during that time than in the previous decade, according to a Jan. 2 report by the Guttmacher Institute, a reproductive-rights advocacy organization.

“Given the ready availability of a safe alternative method of abortion,” it will be difficult for Planned Parenthood to show that Arizona’s law “is a substantial obstacle to a woman’s right to obtain a first trimester abortion in Arizona,” Bury said. Portions of the legislation have been struck down by the U.S. Supreme Court.

Planned Parenthood of Arizona and the Tucson Women’s Clinic said today they are asking the U.S. Court of Appeals in San Francisco to block the regulation, which they say “will severely restrict access to medication abortion.” The appeal couldn’t immediately be confirmed in court records.

‘Safe Alternative’

Laws over use of drugs to induce abortions have been challenged in Indiana, Iowa, North Dakota, Oklahoma and Texas.

“This law serves no purpose other than to prevent Arizona women from using a safe alternative to surgical abortion and force their doctors to follow an outdated, riskier and less effective method,” David Brown, a lawyer with the Center for Reproductive Rights, said in a statement. “This is what happens when politicians, not doctors, practice medicine.”

Arizona’s abortion opponents, supported by 16 other states and the governor of Oklahoma, lost a bid before the Supreme Court in January to revive a part of the 2012 state law that would have generally banned the procedure once a woman’s pregnancy reached the 20th week.

Arizona’s appeal sought to topple a pillar of the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision: its guarantee of access to abortion for women until the fetus is viable. Arizona argued that viability, generally understood to occur at 24 weeks of pregnancy, isn’t an absolute line and that lawmakers should be able to step in earlier to protect a pregnant woman and the developing baby.

Medicaid Funds

The San Francisco appeals court last year upheld a ruling by a federal judge in Phoenix who struck down Arizona’s ban on Medicaid funds for health-care providers who perform abortions because it violates federal rules giving patients the right to choose their own doctor.

In his order, the Arizona judge in the current case explained the statute in terms of a “medication abortion” that includes RU-486, known as Mifepristone or Mifeprex, and Misoprostol, known as Cytotec.

“The statute and corresponding regulation involves a medication abortion protocol” using a combination of the two, according to the order. “The first drug kills the embryo/fetus and the second causes the uterus to contract and expel the embryo/fetus, completing the abortion.”

The case is Planned Parenthood Arizona Inc. v. Humble, 14-cv-01910, U.S. District Court, District of Arizona (Tucson).

To contact the reporter on this story: Edvard Pettersson in federal court in Los Angeles at

epettersson@bloomberg.net

To contact the editors responsible for this story: Michael Hytha at mhytha@bloomberg.net Stephen Farr

Please upgrade your Browser

Your browser is out-of-date. Please download one of these excellent browsers:

Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Opera or Internet Explorer.