June 3 (Bloomberg) -- A Porsche SE manager can’t be blamed for BNP Paribas SA staff failing to understand financial terms used to analyze an option strategy in the carmaker’s failed bid for Volkswagen AG, his lawyers told a German court.
The man, who can be identified only as Christian N., made no mistake when working on an e-mail exchange with the bank while refinancing part of a 10 billion-euro ($13 billion) loan, defense attorney Renate Verjans said in closing arguments at the Stuttgart Regional Court today. Bankers at BNP’s Frankfurt office didn’t know that the term “net purchase price” didn’t refer to liquidity needs, she said.
Christian N. is standing trial alongside former Porsche Chief Financial Officer Holger Haerter on charges they lied about Porsche’s financial condition during the failed bid for VW. Haerter has separately been charged with market manipulation along with former Chief Executive Officer Wendelin Wiedeking over the use of options in the VW bid. A verdict in the case is scheduled for 11 a.m. tomorrow.
“There was a shocking ignorance of the BNP employees in Frankfurt about the structure of the derivative transactions,” Verjans said. “It’s appalling” that that the matter “was handled by people who didn’t properly understand” the financial terminology.
BNP spokesman Dirk-Michael Mitter declined to comment when contacted by Bloomberg News.
Verjans asked the court to acquit her client because the bank had already decided to provide Stuttgart-based Porsche the 500 million-euro share of the loan before the e-mail was sent. Haerter’s lawyer has also asked for an acquittal.
Prosecutors claim the message downplayed the company’s liquidity needs by 1.4 billion euros if it was to acquire a 20 percent stake in Volkswagen. They claim it said Porsche would need to spend 4.1 billion euros, whereas the correct amount would have been 5.5 billion euros. They also argue Porsche failed to disclose 45 million in extra put options against which Porsche held no call options.
Haerter, when granted the last word as a defendant in the case, said he “wouldn’t understand” any other verdict than an acquittal from the court tomorrow. “I did nothing wrong.”
The e-mail was sent on March 19, 2009, six days after the Paris-based BNP credit committee had internally decided to participate in the syndicated loan. The deal was signed on March 24. A Frankfurt-based BNP manager, who negotiated the agreement, had drafted the March 19 statement seeking the additional information and asked Haerter to sign it. The ex-CFO and Christian N. signed the text that was edited by a tax manager and sent it back.
The tax manager, who is now retired, originally was also charged and tried in the case. He settled the charges in November against a payment of 75,000 euros.
Defense lawyer Verjans said BNP never raised concerns about the issue, didn’t file any complaint and continues to do business with Porsche. Her client today is the person at Porsche responsible for dealing with BNP, she said.
“The loan significantly improved BNP’s situation,” said Verjans. The lender “could position itself as one of the leading banks for the European automobile industry.”
Under German law, loan fraud doesn’t require that a creditor is actually deceived or the loan turns sour. The law punishes incorrect statements that could influence the credit decision regardless of the actual effect of the statement on the creditor.
To contact the reporter on this story: Karin Matussek in Stuttgart via firstname.lastname@example.org
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Anthony Aarons at email@example.com