Bloomberg the Company & Products

Bloomberg Anywhere Login


Connecting decision makers to a dynamic network of information, people and ideas, Bloomberg quickly and accurately delivers business and financial information, news and insight around the world.


Financial Products

Enterprise Products


Customer Support

  • Americas

    +1 212 318 2000

  • Europe, Middle East, & Africa

    +44 20 7330 7500

  • Asia Pacific

    +65 6212 1000


Industry Products

Media Services

Follow Us

Lessons From the Hacking Attack That Wasn't

Updated on

Hacking attacks that fizzle can be just as dangerous as those that don't.

This week, the loosely coordinated Anonymous hacking crew promised an all-out assault against U.S. government and banking websites in retaliation for drone attacks and the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Tuesday was supposed to be a day of "justice for the downtrodden," with the sites of more than 100 large organizations coming under sustained denial-of-service computer attacks.

That didn't happen. A few sites, mostly obscure, were defaced or disrupted, and there were only six serious delays overall, according to Carl Herberger, a vice president at Radware, a security firm in Tel Aviv, Israel, that monitored the attacks.

On the surface, "OpUSA" appeared to be a flop. The truth is, though, that we may never know whether it achieved its real aims. The reason? As I described in a Bloomberg News story this week, hackers are refining their skills of misdirection -- and getting rich from it.

Tens of millions of dollars have been stolen from European banks over the past year by criminals using denial-of-service attacks -- launched by them or by political "hacktivists" -- as cover for stealing credit and debit card numbers, according to Symantec, a Mountain View, California-based security firm that investigated the attacks. While the banks' security teams scrambled to keep their sites online, hackers used malicious software to quietly drain customer accounts.

Slideshow: Top Ten Hacking Countries

This week's attacks-that-weren't have the feel of a giant sleight of hand. Maybe the whole thing fizzled because banks' security is getting better, as Herberger suggested. Or maybe Anonymous was trolling the media, which it has been known to do. Another explanation, though, is that maybe the threat of a major attack was just a test to see how officials would react, and possibly a misdirection to pull security resources away from more serious types of fraud.

Considering how tight-lipped major banks are when it comes to addressing security issues, we may never know.

Please upgrade your Browser

Your browser is out-of-date. Please download one of these excellent browsers:

Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Opera or Internet Explorer.