Bloomberg Anywhere Login


Connecting decision makers to a dynamic network of information, people and ideas, Bloomberg quickly and accurately delivers business and financial information, news and insight around the world.


Financial Products

Enterprise Products


Customer Support

  • Americas

    +1 212 318 2000

  • Europe, Middle East, & Africa

    +44 20 7330 7500

  • Asia Pacific

    +65 6212 1000


Industry Products

Media Services

Follow Us

Osborne Suggests an Independent Scotland Wouldn’t Keep Pound

April 21 (Bloomberg) -- U.K. Chancellor of the Exchequer George Osborne suggested a vote for Scottish independence next year would imperil the use of the British pound as the new state’s money because political union is needed to operate a single currency.

The U.K. government on Tuesday, April 23, will publish a study on the implications for the currency of Scottish independence. Osborne made the comments today in a joint article with Danny Alexander, chief secretary to the Treasury.

“A formal currency union can only work with political and economic union,” Osborne and Alexander said in the article published on the Treasury’s website. “The pound we share now works and it works well. Under independence all the alternatives are second best. So our question to the nationalist -- are you really saying second best is good enough for Scotland.”

Voters in Scotland will decide in a referendum set for Sept. 18, 2014, whether to leave the 306-year-old U.K. The semi-autonomous government in Edinburgh has proposed that the new state would continue using the pound and become a shareholder in the Bank of England, which would oversee Scottish lenders.

Scotland’s plan to keep the Bank of England as the lender of last resort and to influence its policy making should nationalists win their bid for independence is “implausible” and “fanciful,” a panel of lawmakers said on April 10.

In a report published today, the Economic Affairs Committee of Britain’s upper House of Lords said the requirements of joining the European Union would mean Scotland would need its own financial regulator. This would create a situation where Scotland’s banks had two regulators in different countries.

To contact the reporter on this story: Gonzalo Vina in Washington at

To contact the editor responsible for this story: James Hertling at

Please upgrade your Browser

Your browser is out-of-date. Please download one of these excellent browsers:

Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Opera or Internet Explorer.