Bloomberg the Company & Products

Bloomberg Anywhere Login

Bloomberg

Connecting decision makers to a dynamic network of information, people and ideas, Bloomberg quickly and accurately delivers business and financial information, news and insight around the world.

Company

Financial Products

Enterprise Products

Media

Customer Support

  • Americas

    +1 212 318 2000

  • Europe, Middle East, & Africa

    +44 20 7330 7500

  • Asia Pacific

    +65 6212 1000

Communications

Industry Products

Media Services

Follow Us

Illinois Lawsuit Against S&P on Ratings Halted by Judge

March 20 (Bloomberg) -- A lawsuit brought by the state of Illinois against the McGraw-Hill Cos. and its Standard & Poor’s unit over allegedly misleading ratings given to residential mortgage-backed securities was halted by a U.S. judge.

U.S. District Judge Matthew Kennelly in Chicago today stopped progress on the case filed last year by Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan, pending determination on whether it will be consolidated with similar cases filed by other states for pretrial proceedings.

“I’m going to grant the motion to stay,” Kennelly told attorneys for both sides in court, granting the companies’ request. The judge also directed the parties to submit papers addressing whether the case should be sent back to the state court where it was filed. The judge said he would rule on May 15.

Madigan sued S&P 14 months ago, alleging that it ignored the risks posed by the securities, and chose to curry favor with its clients, thus contributing to the 2008 U.S. economic downturn.

Connecticut sued in 2010; Mississippi, in 2011. The federal government sued the companies on Feb. 4, followed by states including California, Colorado, Missouri and Pennsylvania.

The businesses have denied the allegations, calling the cases a “hindsight-infused attempt by the states to lay blame with S&P for failing to predict the financial crisis.”

Pending Petition

S&P lawyers moved more than a dozen of the cases to federal courts and followed with requests for court-ordered stays while their petition for consolidation is pending before a federal judicial panel.

“Litigating the state actions separately would involve the wholly inefficient exercise of virtually identical” motions and disputes in each of the various courts, defense lawyers argued in court papers.

Madigan’s office on March 13 asked Kennelly to return the case to Illinois’ Cook County Circuit Court in Chicago, where it was filed, arguing that only state laws are at issue and that the defense decision to remove it to federal court this month was untimely.

The Illinois suit survived one state court test when Judge Mary Anne Mason last year denied a defense motion to dismiss it. She rejected the company’s contention that its rating opinions are protected by the constitutional guarantee of free speech.

McGraw-Hill and Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC must file their opposition to the state’s remand request by April 10, Kennelly said. Illinois’s reply is due by April 24.

The case is People of the State of Illinois v. McGraw-Hill Cos., 13-cv-01725, U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois (Chicago).

To contact the reporter on this story: Andrew Harris in the Chicago federal courthouse at aharris16@bloomberg.net

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Michael Hytha at mhytha@bloomberg.net

Please upgrade your Browser

Your browser is out-of-date. Please download one of these excellent browsers:

Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Opera or Internet Explorer.