Bloomberg the Company & Products

Bloomberg Anywhere Login

Bloomberg

Connecting decision makers to a dynamic network of information, people and ideas, Bloomberg quickly and accurately delivers business and financial information, news and insight around the world.

Company

Financial Products

Enterprise Products

Media

Customer Support

  • Americas

    +1 212 318 2000

  • Europe, Middle East, & Africa

    +44 20 7330 7500

  • Asia Pacific

    +65 6212 1000

Communications

Industry Products

Media Services

Follow Us

‘Name and Shame’ to Halt U.K. Tax-Avoidance Schemes, Panel Says

Don't Miss Out —
Follow us on:
'Name and Shame' to Halt U.K. Tax-Avoidance Schemes
Starbucks Corp. pledged in December to pay a "significant amount" of U.K. corporation tax in 2013 and 2014 "regardless of whether our company is profitable during these years," after the world's largest coffee-shop operator was criticized for not paying any tax for the past three years. Photographer: Chris Ratcliffe/Bloomberg

Feb. 19 (Bloomberg) -- Britain’s tax agency should “name and shame” promoters and clients of “boutique” tax-avoidance schemes to discourage their use, a panel of lawmakers said.

Sellers of such schemes are exploiting the inability of Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs to act quickly enough against the use of loopholes in legislation or the abuse of tax reliefs, the House of Commons Public Accounts Committee said in a report published in London today.

“It is a game of cat and mouse and HMRC is losing,” Margaret Hodge, the opposition Labour Party lawmaker who heads the panel, said in an e-mailed statement. “The complexity of tax law creates opportunities for avoidance, there are no penalties to stop people promoting these schemes, and HMRC is ineffective in challenging promoters who are deliberately obstructive or deliberately sell schemes they know do not work.”

The committee urged the tax agency to “get more robust in its approach.” While at least 5 billion pounds ($7.7 billion) were lost to tax avoidance last year, HMRC does not name promoters or clients of schemes that don’t work, even though it publicizes the details, the panel said.

“We have seen how public anger and consumer pressure can influence large companies, such as Starbucks, to behave more responsibly,” Hodge said.

Starbucks Corp. pledged in December to pay a “significant amount” of U.K. corporation tax in 2013 and 2014 “regardless of whether our company is profitable during these years,” after the world’s largest coffee-shop operator was criticized by members of the Public Accounts Committee for not paying any tax for the past three years.

“We are glad the report exposes the practices of promoters who sell tax-avoidance schemes to wealthy individuals,” HMRC said in an e-mailed statement. “We have also already consulted on strengthening the regulations around these schemes.”

To contact the reporter on this story: Eddie Buckle in London at ebuckle@bloomberg.net

To contact the editor responsible for this story: James Hertling at jhertling@bloomberg.net

Please upgrade your Browser

Your browser is out-of-date. Please download one of these excellent browsers:

Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Opera or Internet Explorer.