Bloomberg Anywhere Remote Login Bloomberg Terminal Demo Request


Connecting decision makers to a dynamic network of information, people and ideas, Bloomberg quickly and accurately delivers business and financial information, news and insight around the world.


Financial Products

Enterprise Products


Customer Support

  • Americas

    +1 212 318 2000

  • Europe, Middle East, & Africa

    +44 20 7330 7500

  • Asia Pacific

    +65 6212 1000


Industry Products

Media Services

Follow Us

Bally Settles IGT Suit Over Slot-Machine Technology

Bally Technologies Inc. settled a patent-infringement lawsuit brought by rival slot-machine maker International Game Technology over technology used in U.S. casinos.

Bally, based in Las Vegas, will get a license to IGT’s technology for monitoring slot-machine use to help decide which players deserve promotional bonuses, Mariya Barnes, an IGT spokeswoman, said today in a statement. Other terms of the settlement were confidential, she said.

Bally said today that sales in the quarter ended Sept. 30 rose 21 percent from a year earlier to $235.2 million, while operating income jumped 43 percent to $53.6 million. Gambling revenue at U.S. casinos climbed 6 percent to $23.8 billion through August, the American Gaming Association said this month.

Delaware, Indiana, Missouri and New Jersey registered declines, while Nevada, the biggest U.S. casino market, posted a 2.4 percent increase through July, the group said Oct. 2.

Mike Trask, a Bally spokesman, didn’t immediately return a call for comment on the IGT settlement today.

IGT, the world’s largest slot-machine maker, sued Bally in 2006 in federal court in Wilmington, Delaware, seeking to block the use of Bally’s “Power Bonusing” system in casinos on the East Coast and in Nevada. IGT, based in Reno, Nevada, alleged that Bally infringed IGT’s “ACSC Power Winners” technology.

U.S. District Judge Sue Robinson ruled in 2009 that IGT’s patents on the slot-machine technology were valid and Bally had infringed them. She also ruled that Bally’s “SDS Power Winners,” “Power Bank” and “Power Promotions” technologies didn’t infringe IGT patents, IGT said at the time.

The case is International Game Technology v. Bally Gaming, 06-282, U.S. District Court, Delaware (Wilmington).

Please upgrade your Browser

Your browser is out-of-date. Please download one of these excellent browsers:

Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Opera or Internet Explorer.