Bloomberg Anywhere Login


Connecting decision makers to a dynamic network of information, people and ideas, Bloomberg quickly and accurately delivers business and financial information, news and insight around the world.


Financial Products

Enterprise Products


Customer Support

  • Americas

    +1 212 318 2000

  • Europe, Middle East, & Africa

    +44 20 7330 7500

  • Asia Pacific

    +65 6212 1000


Industry Products

Media Services

Follow Us

House to Vote on Republican ‘Buffett Rule’ Tax Measure

Warren Buffett, chairman of Berkshire Hathaway Inc. Photographer: David Paul Morris/Bloomberg
Warren Buffett, chairman of Berkshire Hathaway Inc. Photographer: David Paul Morris/Bloomberg

Sept. 19 (Bloomberg) -- Warren Buffett has the name Congress just can’t stop dropping.

When the billionaire said he shouldn’t pay a lower tax rate than his secretary, President Barack Obama and congressional Democrats seized on that reasoning and proposed a minimum federal tax rate for the nation’s top earners. The catchy title they came up with was “the Buffett rule” after the chairman of Berkshire Hathaway Inc.

Republicans in the U.S. House today called up a different tax proposal with a not-so-coincidentally similar title: “The Buffett Rule Act of 2012.” The chamber passed the measure by voice vote.

The bill would make it easier to send extra money to the U.S. government by adding a place on tax returns for voluntary contributions toward paying down the national debt.

“If Warren Buffett wants to give, then H.R. 6410 allows him to give to his heart’s content,” Ways and Means Committee Chairman Dave Camp said during floor debate. The Michigan Republican said the bill “makes it easy for those who want to donate money to the Treasury for debt reduction to voluntarily do so, without raising taxes on entrepreneurs and job creators.”

Democrats couldn’t control the hijacking of their catch phrase, so they settled for reminding constituents that not all “Buffett rules” are equal.

‘Wasting Time’

“Once again, Republicans are wasting time on legislation that won’t accomplish anything, while they continue to protect the wealthy at all costs,” Representative Steny Hoyer of Maryland, the second-ranking House Democrat, said in an e-mail before the vote.

This “isn’t actually the Buffett Rule,” said Hoyer. “This legislation allows citizens to voluntarily donate to paying down the debt -- something which they’re already allowed to do.”

Members of the public already can make contributions to reduce the national debt online by credit card, checking or savings accounts. They also can mail a check to the Bureau of Public Debt. The Republican bill would add federal income tax forms as another means for accepting donations.

The measure says federal income tax forms would include a box alongside the following text: “By checking here, I signify that in addition to my tax liability (if any), I would like to donate the included payment to be used exclusively for the purpose of paying down the national debt.”

Immediate Effect

The measure would see that each donation is deposited in the general fund of the U.S. Treasury and transferred to a special account for gifts to reduce the debt. It would take effect starting with returns for the 2012 tax year.

For Steve Scalise, the Louisiana Republican who authored the legislation, the bill serves two purposes. It would make voluntary debt-reduction contributions as easy to make as the $1 donation to the presidential campaign funds, and it lets the House respond to Obama, who brought Buffett’s secretary, Debbie Bosanek, to his 2012 State of the Union address.

The president “has used Warren Buffett as the poster-child for his class warfare scheme because Buffett complains that he doesn’t pay enough in taxes,” Scalise said in an e-mail before the vote.

Buffett made his remarks about what he considers unfair tax rates in August 2011 and Obama proposed the concept of the “Buffett rule” the following month. Scalise introduced a previous version of his bill, with Buffett’s name as part of the title, last October.

In the Senate, Rhode Island Democrat Sheldon Whitehouse is the lead sponsor of legislation that would set a minimum 30 percent federal tax rate for households with adjusted gross incomes of at least $2 million a year.

A procedural vote on April 16 to proceed to consideration of the bill got 51 supporters in the Democratic-controlled chamber, short of the 60 needed.

Implementation of the Scalise bill would increase revenue by $135 million from 2013 through 2022, according to an estimate released today by the nonpartisan congressional Joint Committee on Taxation. By contrast, the Whitehouse bill’s measure would boost revenue by $47 billion during the next decade, according to JCT.

The bills are H.R. 3099, H.R. 6410 and S. 2230.

To contact the reporters on this story: Timothy R. Homan in Washington at; Megan Hughes in Washington at

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Katherine Rizzo at

Please upgrade your Browser

Your browser is out-of-date. Please download one of these excellent browsers:

Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Opera or Internet Explorer.