The technology wars were supposed to be over. The global adoption of LTE as a common 4G technology was going to heal the rift between the CDMA and GSM camps and give U.S. consumers more freedom to switch between carriers, as well as the ability to choose from a set of common devices that could work on any network. Well, forget it. Verizon Wireless’s planned sale of its extra LTE spectrum pretty much quashes that dream.
Instead of coalescing around mutually exclusive technologies, U.S. carriers are now coalescing around mutually exclusive spectrum bands. The result is the same: A Verizon LTE phone won’t work on an AT&T LTE network and vice-versa. This was always going to be a problem, but Verizon’s proposed fire sale of 700 MHz licenses would essentially codify that rift. If Verizon dumps all of its lower 700 MHz spectrum, it won’t share a single similar license with any of the country’s other operators, effectively creating its own private band within the 700 MHz airwaves.
That means device makers such as Apple will have to design phones that work on Verizon’s network and no one else’s. In that case, dozens of carriers that own spectral real estate in the same band won’t be able to roam onto Verizon’s network. LTE was supposed to change everything, but the industry remains as Balkanized as ever.
The 700 MHz band is a truly messed-up patch of the electromagnetic spectrum. It has been sliced and diced into every sort of license and configuration possible. In 2008, Verizon bid on and won at auction what was essentially a nationwide 22 MHz license called the “upper C block,” over which it is today deploying the first phase of its LTE network.
The C block is a pretty choice chunk of airwaves, though a weird one. Its duplex is reversed, which means the frequencies normally used for the downlink are used for the uplink and vice-versa. That makes C block a special case that requires special hardware. To build devices that work universally across the 700 MHz band, a device maker would be forced to cram filters and other elements into the device to prevent the disparate parts of the band from interfering with one another, a costly proposition.
But Verizon didn’t just pick up the C block in the 2008 auction; it also picked up a bunch of lower A- and B-block licenses in large and midsize cities across the U.S. In the big urban areas—such as New York, Los Angeles and Chicago—Verizon needs greater capacity to meet the higher mobile-broadband demand; those 12 MHz and 24 MHz chunks were supposed to provide that extra bandwidth. But if Verizon wanted to incorporate those additional LTE airwaves into its network, it would have been forced to go to the extra effort and eat the added expense of sourcing cross-band devices.
Dozens of operators also own spectrum in those lower 700 MHz airwaves, which means any device Verizon procured to work across its bands would have also worked on its LTE networks as well. The proposed spectrum sale tosses that scenario out the window. By dumping everything but its core C-block spectrum, Verizon would no longer need to wrestle disparate frequencies into submission. Instead, Verizon gets to segregate itself in the upper half of the band, leaving others to their own devices in the lower half.
Verizon has made the calculation that it’s easier to buy up friendlier airwaves than to try to whip the conflicting halves of the 700 MHz band into shape. That friendlier spectrum happens to be the Advanced Wireless Service (AWS) airwaves at 1700 MHz/2100 MHz, which Verizon is buying from the cable operators. That’s why Big Red has made the regulatory approval of its cable airwaves a condition of its 700 MHz spectrum sale.
The national and tech media have largely portrayed Verizon’s proposed fire sale as a concession to the Federal Communications Commission and the U.S. Department of Justice in exchange for approval of the company’s AWS acquisition from the cable operators. I think that’s hogwash.
Verizon probably had little intention of ever using the lower 700 MHz, if it could be avoided. the company wanted the frequencies as backup while keeping them out of competitors’ hands. Now that the cable operators have presented Verizon with a much more alluring bride in those AWS airwaves, Verizon feels it can trade up to a better class of spectrum.
If the sale goes through, Verizon won’t have to play ball with anyone else. The company will have its band—and its rules.
Verizon isn’t the only one trying to carve its own private band. AT&T is trying to separate itself from the rest of the rabble in the lower 700 MHz by creating its own band class surrounding the B- and C-block licenses it is using to roll out its own LTE network.
Like Verizon, AT&T has legitimate technical reasons for doing so. The main ones are that it would be able to utilize even funkier parts of the 700 MHz for its new super-LTE scheme and avoid interference problems in the A block. The end result will be the same: AT&T isolates itself in part of the electromagnetic spectrum and everyone else gets shut off from the iPhones and other devices that Apple, Samsung (005930:KS), and the rest build for its network.
There’s a chance the FCC won’t let AT&T’s plans fly. There’s also a chance AT&T will buy up a lot or all the A- and B-block licenses Verizon plans to sell, which would suddenly give AT&T common cause with every other lower-700 MHz license owner in the country. But as it stands now, we’re looking at a future with three distinct band classes within 700 MHz: one for Verizon, one for AT&T, and one for everyone else.
If you don’t believe the implications of this are tremendous, just look at Apple’s new 4G iPad. The CDMA version is designed to work on a single 700 MHz network: Verizon’s. The GSM version is designed to work on a single 700 MHz network: AT&T’s.
Also from GigaOM:
Mobile Q1: The Fight for Spectrum Goes to Washington; the Tablet Wars Continue (subscription required)