Bloomberg "Anywhere" Remote Login Bloomberg "Terminal" Request a Demo


Connecting decision makers to a dynamic network of information, people and ideas, Bloomberg quickly and accurately delivers business and financial information, news and insight around the world.


Financial Products

Enterprise Products


Customer Support

  • Americas

    +1 212 318 2000

  • Europe, Middle East, & Africa

    +44 20 7330 7500

  • Asia Pacific

    +65 6212 1000


Industry Products

Media Services

Follow Us

Christie Economist Says He Doesn’t Support Millionaire’s Tax

March 27 (Bloomberg) -- New Jersey Governor Chris Christie’s chief economist, Charles Steindel, said he doesn’t advocate passage of a temporary tax increase on the state’s wealthiest residents.

While at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Steindel co-wrote a research report in which he said a tax surcharge on the wealthy would help offset lower revenue during an economic slowdown. Bloomberg News published an article on the study yesterday.

Today, speaking to the Senate Budget Committee in Trenton, Steindel, 60, said New Jersey doesn’t need such a tax increase. He said he didn’t recommend the surcharge while at the New York Fed and only mentioned it in the report as an option. He joined the Christie administration in November 2010, four months after the report.

“We are fortunately not in that position now and revenue is increasing,” Steindel said. “There is no evolution in that, no contradiction in thought.”

As Christie’s chief economist, Steindel has projected the state’s revenue collections will rise 7.3 percent in the fiscal year beginning July 1 to fund the governor’s $32.1 billion budget.

David Rosen, chief revenue forecaster for the nonpartisan Office of Legislative Services, today projected revenue will trail Christie’s projections by a combined $537 million for this fiscal year and next. The shortfalls will amount to $145 million in fiscal 2012 and $392 million in the year that begins July 1, he said.

‘Larger Burden’

“Temporarily raising income taxes on high-income households during a downturn” would have the advantage of placing “a larger burden on households that are less liquidity-constrained,” Steindel, wrote in the July 2010 report with economists Richard Deitz and Andrew Haughwout.

Christie, 49, a first-term Republican, has twice vetoed measures sponsored by Democrats that would have raised income taxes on residents earning $1 million or more. He has said any increase would halt the state’s economic recovery, and that the 10 percent income-tax cut he proposed in January is the key to bringing jobs back to New Jersey.

To contact the reporter on this story: Terrence Dopp in Trenton at

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Mark Tannenbaum at

Please upgrade your Browser

Your browser is out-of-date. Please download one of these excellent browsers:

Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Opera or Internet Explorer.