Bloomberg Anywhere Login


Connecting decision makers to a dynamic network of information, people and ideas, Bloomberg quickly and accurately delivers business and financial information, news and insight around the world.


Financial Products

Enterprise Products


Customer Support

  • Americas

    +1 212 318 2000

  • Europe, Middle East, & Africa

    +44 20 7330 7500

  • Asia Pacific

    +65 6212 1000


Industry Products

Media Services

Follow Us

Porsche to Appeal Court Ruling Over Executive’s Duty Violation

March 4 (Bloomberg) -- Porsche SE said it will appeal a Feb. 29 court ruling that said Ferdinand Piech violated his duties as a member of the carmaker’s supervisory board during its takeover bid of Volkswagen AG in 2009.

In a statement today that cites Piech directly, the supervisory board member said the Stuttgart Higher Regional Court’s ruling did not accurately assess the context in which he made statements to reporters at an event in 2009. Porsche said it will appeal to the Federal Supreme Court.

The court decided Piech, also chairman of VW, was wrong to tell reporters at an event in Sardinia that he was unaware of the extent of the option risks that the carmaker had built up in bidding for control over VW and that he was wrong not to seek clarity about it. The decision was part of a ruling voiding votes by Porsche shareholders that discharged Piech and the rest of the supervisory board from responsibility for the financial year ending in 2009, the court said in a statement.

“I can’t -- even after examining the OLG Court in Stuttgart’s ruling -- see how I violated my duties,” Piech said in the statement today. The ruling “in my opinion doesn’t assess the situation accurately,” he said.

The court ruled Piech’s words could also have been understood as a critical comment, as part of the controversy within the company at the time, arguing that the risk from the options was incalculable.

Such a statement is also improper because it would endanger Porsche’s creditworthiness, the court said.

Piech said today his “core position” at the time of the comments to reporters was that the takeover “concept followed by the then-executive board was no longer the right one for the future.” For that reason, “the options -- and the risks that go with them in the nature of things -- shouldn’t have been maintained any longer,” he said.

To contact the reporter on this story: Brian Parkin in Berlin at

To contact the editor responsible for this story: James Hertling at

Please upgrade your Browser

Your browser is out-of-date. Please download one of these excellent browsers:

Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Opera or Internet Explorer.