Bloomberg Anywhere Remote Login Bloomberg Terminal Demo Request


Connecting decision makers to a dynamic network of information, people and ideas, Bloomberg quickly and accurately delivers business and financial information, news and insight around the world.


Financial Products

Enterprise Products


Customer Support

  • Americas

    +1 212 318 2000

  • Europe, Middle East, & Africa

    +44 20 7330 7500

  • Asia Pacific

    +65 6212 1000


Industry Products

Media Services

Follow Us

Bloomberg Customers

Disney’s Costly ‘John Carter’ Fights Critics Along With Martians

In the new Walt Disney Co. film “John Carter,” a Civil War veteran transported to Mars fights giant saber-toothed apes and four-armed, sword-wielding aliens.

Things are only a little less scary here on earth, where the pricey picture -- researcher Box Office Mojo pegs its cost at about $250 million, not counting marketing -- is already battling bad buzz, reports of cost overruns, and criticism of Disney’s early marketing.

Hollywood studios in recent years have made fewer, more expensive films that can spawn sequels and become long-lived franchises. When it works, the payoff is big: The Harry Potter string of eight films has brought in $7.7 billion at the box office. For every “Toy Story,” there’s a “The Adventures of Pluto Nash,” which made back less than a 10th its estimated $100 million budget through ticket sales, Bloomberg Businessweek reports in its March 5 edition.

“John Carter” is also a test of whether Burbank, California-based Disney can spread the magic of animation powerhouse Pixar, which it acquired in 2006 for $7.01 billion, to live-action films.

Andrew Stanton, the writer and director of “John Carter,” previously co-wrote and directed Pixar hits “Finding Nemo” and “WALL-E,” for which he won Academy Awards. He was a writer on “Monsters, Inc.” and all three “Toy Story” movies. While “John Carter” isn’t just different because it uses real actors, it’s more costly than any of Stanton’s previous films.

‘Hurt Earnings’

“It can hurt earnings if it’s not huge,” Vasily Karasyov, a New York-based analyst with Susquehanna Financial Group, says.

So far, “John Carter,” which opens March 9, isn’t looking huge.

Entertainment website estimates the film will take in $60 million in its domestic theatrical run, based on the performance of similar films, the release date, and online chatter on websites such as Twitter and Facebook.

“This is a movie that should be hitting the sweet spot of males age 18 to 34,” says Phil Contrino, editor of the site. “It better make a killing internationally.”

Stanton’s Nemo, produced for an estimated $94 million in 2003, took in some $868 million in global ticket sales, according to Box Office Mojo. “WALL-E,” a 2008 release, cost $180 million and grossed $521 million worldwide. That resume hasn’t shielded Stanton from doubters.

Big-Budget Scrutiny

“When people make a $250 million picture, they’re putting themselves in the middle of a bull’s-eye,” says James Jacks, a producer of “The Mummy,” who himself spent eight years trying to bring the “John Carter” story to life at Viacom Inc.’s Paramount Pictures. Jacks says he liked Stanton’s film and told him so at the Feb. 22 premiere for industry notables. Still, “I would have made it for a lot less money,” he says.

Critics point to marketing gaffes, such as an initial trailer that appeared too similar to other movies, and the studio’s decision to drop the identifying words “of Mars,” from the title after Disney’s similarly named “Mars Needs Moms” bombed last year.

“It doesn’t have an audience looking forward to it,” says Harry Knowles, a reviewer for the website, who says he enjoyed the film. “Disney marketing has been lazy and too late.”

Disney’s Marvel unit has published a series of “John Carter” comic books, while other merchandise, from action figures to costumes, has yet to appear.

No Merchandise

“John Carter” joins “Tangled” and “Pirates of the Caribbean: On Stranger Tides” as among the most expensive films Disney has produced, according to Box Office Mojo. First place goes to “Pirates of the Caribbean: At World’s End” at $300 million, which had successful predecessor films before its large budget was set.

The movies are part of a trend at Disney of placing larger bets on fewer films. The studio expects to distribute 12 of its own pictures in the U.S. this year, down from 19 a decade ago, according to company filings. Disney put 80 percent of its fiscal 2011 production budget into multifilm franchises such as “Cars” and “Pirates of the Caribbean,” up from 40 percent in 2010, Chief Financial Officer Jay Rasulo said last year.

Matthew Harrigan, an analyst at Denver-based Wunderlich Securities, says some of “John Carter” may be unsuitable for small children, and it’s unlikely to spawn products elsewhere in the Disney universe, such as theme-park rides or cartoons.

Edgar Rice Burroughs

The film is based on a 100-year-old series of novels by Edgar Rice Burroughs, creator of Tarzan. Stanton recalled reading the stories as a child and has long itched to bring them to the big screen.

Paul Roeder, a Disney spokesman, says criticism of the film’s budget and marketing are unfounded. He says Stanton finished the film on time and stayed within the original budget. It’s also too soon to judge the still-unfolding marketing campaign, he says.

Stanton has already outlined two potential sequels should “John Carter” become a hit.

Asked by a fan via Twitter on Feb. 24 whether he was nervous about the opening, Stanton replied: “Wouldn’t you be? (but it’s a good nervous.)”

Please upgrade your Browser

Your browser is out-of-date. Please download one of these excellent browsers:

Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Opera or Internet Explorer.