Bloomberg Anywhere Remote Login Bloomberg Terminal Demo Request


Connecting decision makers to a dynamic network of information, people and ideas, Bloomberg quickly and accurately delivers business and financial information, news and insight around the world.


Financial Products

Enterprise Products


Customer Support

  • Americas

    +1 212 318 2000

  • Europe, Middle East, & Africa

    +44 20 7330 7500

  • Asia Pacific

    +65 6212 1000


Industry Products

Media Services

Follow Us

Bloomberg Customers

Goldman Sachs Said to Receive Subpoena From New York Prosecutor

Goldman Sachs Said to Receive Subpoena
Goldman Sachs Group Inc. has dropped 16 percent in New York trading since the Senate subcommittee, led by Michigan Democrat Carl M. Levin, used the firm as a case study in a 640-page report on its findings released in April. Photographer: Jin Lee/Bloomberg

Goldman Sachs Group Inc., the fifth-biggest U.S. bank by assets, was subpoenaed by the Manhattan District Attorney’s office for information on the firm’s activities leading into the credit crisis, two people familiar with the matter said.

The subpoena relates to the U.S. Senate’s Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations report on Wall Street’s role in the collapse of the financial markets, which accused New York-based Goldman Sachs of misleading buyers of mortgage-linked investments, the people said, speaking on condition of anonymity because the inquiry isn’t public.

Goldman Sachs has dropped 16 percent in New York trading since the Senate subcommittee, led by Michigan Democrat Carl M. Levin, used the firm as a case study in a 640-page report on its findings released in April. At the time, Levin said Goldman Sachs had also misled Congress about the company’s bets on the housing market. The firm has said its testimony was truthful.

“We don’t comment on specific regulatory or legal issues, but subpoenas are a normal part of the information request process and, of course, when we receive them we cooperate fully,” said David Wells, a company spokesman.

A subpoena is a request for information and doesn’t mean the company is a target of a criminal investigation. Analysts including Sanford C. Bernstein & Co.’s Brad Hintz have said they don’t expect the firm to be criminally prosecuted.

Erin Duggan, chief spokeswoman for Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr., declined to comment.

Shares Decline

Goldman Sachs dropped 1.3 percent to $134.38 in New York Stock Exchange composite trading yesterday.

The Senate report was referred to the U.S. Department of Justice and the Securities and Exchange Commission, which are also investigating.

Levin said when his report was released that federal prosecutors should review whether to bring perjury charges against Goldman Sachs Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Lloyd Blankfein, 56, and other current and former employees who testified to Congress last year. Levin said they denied under oath that Goldman Sachs took a financial position against the mortgage market solely for its own profit, statements the senator said were untrue.

Schneiderman’s Probe

Goldman Sachs met last month with New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman’s office as part of his examination of mortgage securitization before the housing collapse, according to a person familiar with the matter, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because the probe isn’t public. The meeting took place within the past two weeks, the person said.

Schneiderman has been conducting a broad examination of mortgage practices and the packaging and sale of loans to investors, according to the person. JPMorgan Chase & Co., UBS AG, Deutsche Bank AG, Bank of America Corp., Morgan Stanley and the Royal Bank of Scotland Group Plc also are part of that investigation, the person said. Four bond insurers have been subpoenaed as well.

Lauren Passalacqua, a spokeswoman for Schneiderman, declined comment, as did Goldman Sachs’s Wells.

Last year Goldman Sachs paid $550 million to settle SEC claims related to its marketing of the complex securities known as collateralized debt obligations. The settlement resolved claims that the company failed to disclose that hedge fund Paulson & Co. was betting against, and influenced the selection of, CDOs the company was packaging and selling.

Please upgrade your Browser

Your browser is out-of-date. Please download one of these excellent browsers:

Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Opera or Internet Explorer.