Bloomberg the Company & Products

Bloomberg Anywhere Login

Bloomberg

Connecting decision makers to a dynamic network of information, people and ideas, Bloomberg quickly and accurately delivers business and financial information, news and insight around the world.

Company

Financial Products

Enterprise Products

Media

Customer Support

  • Americas

    +1 212 318 2000

  • Europe, Middle East, & Africa

    +44 20 7330 7500

  • Asia Pacific

    +65 6212 1000

Communications

Industry Products

Media Services

Follow Us

Wisconsin Labor Law Challenge by County Official Is Dismissed

April 15 (Bloomberg) -- A Wisconsin county official was ruled ineligible to sue to block a state law stripping government employee unions of most of their collective bargaining power.

Dane County Executive Kathleen Falk and County Board Chairman Scott McDonell lack standing to challenge the law on constitutional grounds in their official capacities, Dane County Circuit Judge Maryann Sumi ruled yesterday. Falk and McDonell may be able to sue as individuals, Sumi said.

“Under longstanding Wisconsin law, an agency or arm of government lacks authority to challenge the constitutionality of state statues,” Sumi wrote in her opinion.

Falk’s lawsuit was one of three filed seeking to block legislation signed by Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker, a Republican, on March 11. The bill requires annual recertification votes for union representation by public employees and makes payment of union dues voluntary. Firefighters and police officers are exempt.

“We haven’t decided if we will sue as citizens,” McDonell said in a phone interview. “Someone needs to represent the taxpayers of Wisconsin in this matter.”

Falk didn’t immediately return phone calls seeking comment.

Democrats and organized labor opposed the legislation as an attack on worker rights. Opposition sparked almost four weeks of protests around and inside the state capitol.

Temporary Ban

Dane County District Attorney Ismael Ozanne last month sued four Republican lawmakers, alleging they violated the state’s open meetings law when they crafted the legislation. Sumi temporarily barred the law from taking effect. State Attorney General J. B. Van Hollen petitioned the Supreme Court to dismiss Ozanne’s complaint.

In her opinion yesterday, Sumi wrote that Ozanne has “explicit statutory authority” to enforce alleged open meetings law violations. Dane County doesn’t, she said.

“We’re pleased that Judge Sumi reached the right result on this motion,” Bill Cosh, a spokesman for Van Hollen, said yesterday in an e-mailed statement. “We will continue our efforts to defend this lawsuit and believe that we will ultimately be successful.”

The case is Dane County v. State of Wisconsin, 11-cv-01175, Dane County, Wisconsin, Circuit Court (Madison). The prosecutor’s case is State of Wisconsin Ex Rel. Ozanne v. Fitzgerald, 11-cv-1244, Dane County, Wisconsin, Circuit Court (Madison).

To contact the reporters on this story: Sophia Pearson in Philadelphia at spearson3@bloomberg.net; Marie Rohde in Madison at fmarierohde@gmail.com

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Michael Hytha at mhytha@bloomberg.net

Please upgrade your Browser

Your browser is out-of-date. Please download one of these excellent browsers:

Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Opera or Internet Explorer.