July 26 (Bloomberg) -- Here’s the plot: an unmarried, foreign-born, atheist woman whose partner is a male hairdresser wants to lead a major nation famous for manly men. Her opponent is the “Mad Monk” -- a Speedo-loving amateur boxer who once studied to be a priest.
The latest Fox sitcom? Nope, it’s the script for next month’s Australian election. It really would be hard to make this stuff up. And yet there is a farcical angle worth noting here. The Aug. 21 contest has been dubbed the “Seinfeld Election,” meaning that it’s about nothing.
No bold plans about Australia’s future from Labor Prime Minister Julia Gillard or Liberal opposition leader Tony Abbott, no grand designs to improve competitiveness, no fresh thinking about the risks of becoming China’s fuel station. Plenty of chatter about emotionally charged issues such as asylum seekers arriving by boat. Little about what role the nation of 21 million wants to play in a fast-changing global economy.
This idea-starved election should concern all of us who have grown accustomed to Australia beating the odds. Nineteen consecutive years without recession is bound to breed complacency on the part of officials in Canberra. That also goes for investors who see Australia as a risk-free part of their international strategy.
‘Yadda, Yadda, Yadda’
“Yadda, yadda, yadda,” to borrow an oft-heard phrase on Jerry Seinfeld’s 1989 to 1998 television show, won’t do for Australia. Autopilot has been the setting for this $1 trillion “miracle” economy for a decade now. It’s time for officials to grab the controls once again.
The nation’s failing infrastructure, overstretched education system and increasingly polarized economy need addressing, and now. Instead, the election campaign is being driven by focus-group research and populism. So lackluster is the discourse that politicians are competing with “MasterChef.”
Last night’s Gillard-Abbott debate was actually rescheduled to avoid clashing with the popular cooking show’s finale. Voters being more interested in who churns out the tastiest tuna tataki or best masala potatoes than who runs their nation is a sad commentary on the caliber of Australia’s choices. If Welsh-born Gillard and her opponent, Abbott, are wondering about the missing ingredient, it’s inspiration.
Gillard and Abbott both are untested entities devoid of vision. Rarely has the need for it been so great.
Australians clamoring for visionary leadership faced a bit too much nostalgia recently as former Prime Ministers Bob Hawke and Paul Keating brawled in the media over their respective legacies. It was a bizarre and ugly exchange prompted by a book, published by Hawke’s mistress-turned-wife, that Keating says airbrushed over his achievements. Keating defended himself in a letter to Hawke published in the Australian newspaper.
While the spat won’t sway the election, it raised two questions about Gillard’s Labor Party. First, are divisive politics distracting Labor from addressing Australia’s big challenges? Second, and more importantly, where have the really big thinkers gone?
The combined tenures of Hawke (1983 to 1991) and Keating (1991 to 1996) were a watershed for the 14th-biggest economy. Import tariffs were removed, the dollar was allowed to float, the financial industry was opened and a national, compulsory pension program was introduced.
It has been coasting ever since, sometimes in the wrong direction. John Howard (1996 to 2007) seemed to forget Australia was near Asia, preferring to cozy up to former U.S. President George W. Bush and his foreign-policy disasters. Howard’s successor, Kevin Rudd (2007 to 2010), was far more focused on the fast-growing region in which Australians live.
Dismal approval ratings and few solid achievements did in Rudd last month. His planned tax on mining profits enraged the business world and backfired. After deposing Rudd, Gillard will have the challenge to set out a clear roadmap for the future. All she is offering is vague platitudes.
Take environmental policy. Gillard’s government unveiled plans for a citizens’ assembly to build consensus on putting a price on carbon. Presumably, she has forgotten that Australia already has a 150-person-strong group that voters select and pay for that job. It’s called parliament.
Chinese demand for resources is another challenge. This mining boom is creating a “two-speed economy,” pitting Western Australia against the rest of a nation facing tepid wage growth and the threat of higher interest rates. Other than kowtowing to billionaire miners, neither Gillard nor Abbott has presented a plan to rebalance the economy.
Immigration also looms large. Gillard has already put the kibosh on Rudd’s “big Australia” policy. She’s couching her stance on population control in environmental terms. The fact she hasn’t defined sustainable population growth has critics arguing she is pandering to voters aggrieved by what they see as lax immigration enforcement.
Talk about weak-kneed approaches to the biggest challenges of our time. Since this is an election about nothing, lots of focus is on Gillard’s lifestyle. Is a woman perceived to put career before family a good role model, journalists ask. It’s irrelevant to her leadership skills -- not to mention unfair.
The question that matters is how Gillard or Abbott plan to lead Australia. No one really knows, and, unlike Seinfeld, this is no laughing matter.
(William Pesek is a Bloomberg News columnist. The opinions expressed are his own.)
To contact the writer of this column: William Pesek in Tokyo at email@example.com
To contact the editor responsible for this column: James Greiff at firstname.lastname@example.org