The Licensed Taxi Drivers Association has filed criminal proceedings in London against six Uber Technologies Inc. drivers, blocking transport officials from seeking guidance from a civil court on the mobile-phone app.
The move is the latest by local taxi drivers to block the approval of Uber’s app, which connects passengers with cars. Transport for London said that its bid to have a civil court clarify rules for what constitutes a regulated taxi service would have to wait until criminal cases are finished.
Uber has come under fire by traditional taxi drivers worldwide who say they are bound by rules that don’t apply to the smartphone-based system. Last month cabbies in London snarled traffic, protesting what they saw as the government’s failure to hold Uber to the same standards as other car services.
“The reason we have gone down the private prosecution route as opposed to the judicial direction routes is that we have no confidence in TFL’s legal team,” Steve McNamara, the general secretary of the LTDA, said today in a phone interview. “TfL as a regulator are not fit for purpose.''
The Uber drivers are scheduled to appear at Westminster Magistrate’s court towards the end of the month, McNamara said.
Uber said the LTDA’s action will stop the civil review and unfairly drag its drivers into a drawn out legal process.
‘‘We’re confident that common sense will prevail eventually, but it is shortsighted that the whole process has now been extended considerably which isn’t helpful to anyone, not least the partner-drivers involved,” Jo Bertram, general manager for Uber in the U.K. and Ireland, said in a statement. “Needless to say we stand right behind them and will give all the support they need”
In the U.K., individuals or groups have the right to bring a private prosecution directly to criminal courts.
Transport for London said today that Uber apps that calculate fares aren’t the same as taxi meters, which traditional black cabs use to determine the cost of a journey by means of time and distance.
“Smart phones that transmit location information (based on GPS data) between vehicles and operators, have no operational or physical connection with the vehicles, and receive information about fares which are calculated remotely from the vehicle, are not taximeters within the meaning of the legislation,” the London transport agency said in a statement.
Uber, based in San Francisco, said the decision by TfL to approve the app was a “victory for common sense, technology and innovation.”
“Following another round of scrutiny, Uber has yet again been rubber stamped by TfL as a fully compliant operator,” Uber’s Bertram said in a separate statement.
TfL’s attempts to have a London High Court judge validate this view have been put on hold until the resolution of the LTDA’s criminal complaints.
The criminal court decision “will almost certainly be appealed (by someone), which inevitably means the matter will end up, rather later than sooner, in the High Court,” Leon Daniels, TfL’s managing director of surface transport, said in the statement. “I regret therefore that the essential, and binding, clarity about how the law should be applied in these circumstances will not be delivered for some considerable time.”
Traditional taxi drivers have won civil court rulings in European cities including Berlin and Brussels in cases challenging Uber’s ability to operate.
Backed by Google Inc.’s investment arm and Amazon.com Inc. founder Jeff Bezos, Uber is working to expand from the U.S. into Europe and Asia, and is available in more than 140 cities. The network was valued at $17 billion after it raised $1.2 billion last month in a financing round so it can build operations.
To contact the reporter on this story: Jeremy Hodges in London at firstname.lastname@example.org
To contact the editors responsible for this story: Anthony Aarons at email@example.com Mark Beech