Breaking News


Banks Get New Review on Credit Union Agency's Lawsuit

The U.S. Supreme Court told a lower court to take another look at a ruling that let the National Credit Union Administration sue a group of banks for allegedly deceiving investors about mortgage-backed securities.

The justices today ordered reconsideration of the ruling in light of a decision they reached earlier this month on the deadlines for filing some environmental suits.

The NCUA sued banks including units of Wells Fargo & Co. (WFC) and Royal Bank of Scotland Group Plc (RBS) after the agency took over two corporate credit unions. The NCUA says those credit unions invested $1.74 billion in mortgage-backed securities, many of which the agency says were riskier than the offering documents indicated.

The banks contend that federal securities law imposes a firm three-year deadline for suits -- a deadline they say the NCUA missed. A federal appeals court in Denver disagreed, citing a provision in a 1989 law that extends the time for a government regulator to sue on behalf of a failed financial institution.

In ordering reconsideration, the justices pointed to a June 9 decision in a case involving environmental suits.

NCUA has filed similar lawsuits against units of Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (GS), JPMorgan Chase & Co. and other banks.

The Supreme Court case is Nomura Home Equity Loan v. National Credit Union Administration, 13-576.

To contact the reporter on this story: Greg Stohr in Washington at

To contact the editors responsible for this story: Patrick Oster at Mark McQuillan, Laurie Asseo

Press spacebar to pause and continue. Press esc to stop.

Bloomberg reserves the right to remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.