Corporate Contribution Ban Left Intact by U.S. Supreme Court

Photographer: Chris Maddaloni/CQ Roll Call via Getty Images

Demonstrators hold a rally in front of the Maryland State House to "fight secret spending in our democracy." Close

Demonstrators hold a rally in front of the Maryland State House to "fight secret... Read More

Close
Open
Photographer: Chris Maddaloni/CQ Roll Call via Getty Images

Demonstrators hold a rally in front of the Maryland State House to "fight secret spending in our democracy."

The U.S. Supreme Court left intact Iowa’s ban on corporate political donations, as the justices declined a chance to extend last week’s ruling striking down federal contribution limits.

The justices, making no comment, today rejected an appeal by the Iowa Right to Life Committee Inc., a nonprofit corporation that said the state measure violates rights to free speech and equal protection.

The law bars campaign contributions by for-profit and nonprofit corporations, as well as banks, savings and loans, credit unions and insurance companies. A St. Louis-based federal appeals court upheld the measure last year.

The Supreme Court had been holding the group’s appeal while it resolved the challenge to the federal contribution caps.

The high court’s 5-4 ruling last week concerned the speech rights of individual contributors, rather than corporate donors. The case centered on a federal law that capped the total amount a person could give to candidates, parties and political committees to $123,200 in a two-year election cycle.

The court said restrictions could validly target only “quid pro quo” corruption -- that is, donations aimed at extracting specific political favors.

Citizens United

Iowa Right to Life contended in its appeal that the Supreme Court’s 2010 Citizens United ruling, which allowed unlimited corporate spending, should also govern contributions. The advocacy group urged the justices to overturn a 2003 Supreme Court decision that upheld a federal ban on contributions by nonprofit advocacy groups.

In ruling against Iowa Right to Life, the St. Louis-based appeals court said the Supreme Court alone has the “prerogative of overruling its own decisions.”

Iowa Right to Life also argued that the state law violates the Constitution’s equal protection clause because it doesn’t bar labor union contributions to candidates.

The case is Iowa Right to Life Committee v. Tooker, 13-407.

To contact the reporter on this story: Greg Stohr in Washington at gstohr@bloomberg.net

To contact the editors responsible for this story: Patrick Oster at poster@bloomberg.net Mark McQuillan, Jodi Schneider

Bloomberg reserves the right to remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.