Breaking News

Tweet TWEET

SEC-Bitcoin, Shadow Banking, N.Y. Probe: Compliance

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission is conducting a formal inquiry into an online gambling website’s Bitcoin-denominated stock sale after the agency signaled that such dealings may break U.S. laws.

The SEC sent a letter asking MPEx, an online exchange for Bitcoin-based trading, to provide contracts and other documents relating to SatoshiDice.com, according to a copy of the request posted on the website trilema.com.

Mircea Popescu, the MPEx operator to whom the letter was addressed, confirmed its receipt in an e-mail to Bloomberg News and said MPEx hasn’t broken any laws. The letter lists SatoshiDice as the topic of the inquiry without specifying what rules are at issue.

Andrew Ceresney, the SEC’s enforcement director, said in January that the agency is “very focused” on whether Bitcoin-denominated stock exchanges are illegal. U.S. laws require securities-trading platforms to be licensed. The regulator’s decision to open an inquiry doesn’t mean its staff has concluded any rules were broken, according to the letter.

John Nester, a spokesman for the regulator, said he couldn’t confirm or deny the existence of any inquiry.

SatoshiDice listed shares on MPEx in August 2012, according to an MPEx-affiliated website.

Compliance Policy

Shadow Banking Deals Prompt SEC Plan to Cap Leverage for Brokers

U.S. regulators concerned that banks and brokerage firms remain too dependent on risky types of short-term funding are weighing new rules designed to reduce reliance on parts of what is often called the shadow banking system.

Now the Securities and Exchange Commission is weighing new funding rules for brokers as well as a limit on leverage similar to those used by the Federal Reserve and other regulators for banks, according to a regulatory document and SEC officials familiar with the matter.

The initiatives are aimed at financing tools such as repurchase agreements, or repos, that were relied on by Bear Stearns Cos. and Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. until their failures accelerated the 2008 financial crisis. Fed officials have warned for years that the $4.5 trillion web of repo deals remains prone to unravel during a panic, potentially leading to a wider financial panic.

The SEC oversees broker-dealers, the largest of which are owned by big banks supervised by the Fed. The broker-dealer units of banks including JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) and Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (GS) would be affected by the proposal, as would firms such as Leucadia National Corp. (LUK)’s Jefferies Group LLC that aren’t within Fed-regulated holding companies.

For more, click here.

Interviews/Commentary

Levitt Says High-Frequency Trading Is Domain of SEC, Not N.Y. AG

Arthur Levitt, former head of the Securities and Exchange Commission, said New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman is overstepping his bounds by calling for tougher regulations on high-frequency trading. Levitt talked with Tom Keene and Michael McKee on Bloomberg Radio’s “Bloomberg Surveillance.”

To listen, click here.

SEC Chief Plans Outreach ‘Soon’ on Disclosure Rules

Securities and Exchange Commission Chairman Mary Jo White, speaking at the Chamber of Commerce’s Capital Markets Summit in Washington, said she intends to have more to say on disclosure regulations soon.

White, who has asked staff to make recommendations on how to proceed, said she looks at disclosures in terms of making them more meaningful for investors, not just a means of reducing overload.

She also said that while institutional investors tend to want as much information as possible, there is a risk that when retail investors are given too many details they may “seize” on unimportant data. Distilling data is helpful to all investors, she said.

To contact the reporter on this story: Carla Main in New York at cmain2@bloomberg.net

To contact the editors responsible for this story: Michael Hytha at mhytha@bloomberg.net Stephen Farr, Andrew Dunn

Press spacebar to pause and continue. Press esc to stop.

Bloomberg reserves the right to remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.