In the case, filed in Texas state court March 14, Schlumberger accused Charlotte Rutherford of retaining the company’s confidential data after leaving her position. Rutherford joined Acacia Research Corp. (ACTG) of Newport Beach, California, in June 2013, according to an Acacia statement.
The oil-services company said in court papers that it began investigating Rutherford’s departure as the result of litigation filed against the company by a third party. Schlumberger was accused Feb. 4 of infringing an Acacia patent in federal court in Austin, Texas, according to court papers.
The case against Rutherford is “a bullying tactic in response to a patent infringement action brought against Schlumberger, Adam J. Handelsman, an Acacia spokesman, said in an e-mail. He called the suit baseless.
The case against Rutherford is Schlumberger Ltd. v. Ritherford, 2014-123621, District Court of Harris County, Texas. The patent case is Dynamic 3D Geosolutions LLC v. Schlumberger Ltd., 1:14-cv-00112, U.S. District Court, Western District of Texas (Austin).
Google Told to Pay SimpleAir $85 Million in Web Patent Trial
Google Inc. (GOOG) was ordered by a jury in Texas to pay $85 million to SimpleAir Inc. for using the closely held company’s technology for transmitting Internet-based data to computers and mobile devices without a license.
SimpleAir, a technology licensing company, sought as much as $146 million in the trial before a federal jury in Marshall, Texas. A different jury in January found that Google infringed a patent issued in 2006. It was unable to reach an agreement on how much the company should pay.
The case focused on Google Cloud Messaging and Cloud to Device Messaging, which process and send notification messages to smartphones and tablet computers that run on Google’s Android operating system, the most popular platform for mobile devices.
In the January trial, Google denied infringing the patent and claimed it didn’t represent a new invention. The Mountain View, California-based company has indicated it will appeal. It also argued that, because Facebook Inc. (FB) licenses the SimpleAir patent, royalties shouldn’t include any applications provided through the social-networking site.
The case is SimpleAir Inc. v. Microsoft Corp., 11-cv-416, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Texas (Marshall).
For more patent news, click here.
Louisiana Legislators Looking at Releasing ‘Jazzland’ Mark
Louisiana lawmakers are considering legislation that would remove restrictions on the ‘‘Jazzland” trademark formerly used with a now-defunct New Orleans theme park, the New Orleans Times-Picayune reported.
Einstein Noah Sued Over Name for Smoked Salmon Bagel Sandwich
In a complaint filed March 18 in federal court in Denver, Rocky Mountain Honey Smoked Fish Co. claims that Einstein Noah is accused of selling a “Honey Smoked Salmon” sandwich that infringes the fish company’s mark. The Aurora, Colorado-based fish company claims the bagel company is using inferior fish and the public is confused by the unauthorized use of the name.
Einstein Noah doesn’t believe the fish company’s claims have any merit, Kristina Jorge, a spokeswoman, said in a statement. She said the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office declined to approve the fish company’s trademark application on the grounds that the phrase is “merely descriptive.”
The case is Rocky Mountain Honey Smoked Fish Co. v. Einstein Noah Restaurant Group Inc., 1:14-cv-00803, U.S. District Court, District of Colorado (Denver).
For more trademark news, click here.
For copyright news, click here.