Spain’s Princess Cristina Named as Suspect in Corruption Probe

Princess Cristina, King Juan Carlos’s younger daughter, was named as an official suspect in a Spanish court investigation of corruption allegations centered on her husband’s business activities.

Judge Jose Castro at the regional court of the Balearic Islands ruled that the princess, suspected of tax evasion and money laundering, should give evidence on March 8, the court said in a ruling sent by e-mail today. A spokesman for the royal family declined to comment.

Pressure is increasing on the Spanish monarchy, which has seen its public support decline amid the corruption investigation, as the ailing King struggles to carry out his duties. Cristina’s husband Inaki Urdangarin, a former Olympic handball player, is a suspect of fraud, embezzlement and money laundering in the probe that focuses on the non-profit Noos Institute he chaired.

The institute won 5.8 million euros ($7.9 million) of contracts from the regional governments of Valencia and the Balearic Islands between 2004 and 2007 without participating in a competitive tender, ABC newspaper reported.

Cristina was previously named as a suspect in April last year before that ruling was overturned following opposition from the public prosecutors.

Support for the monarchy as a system of government in Spain fell to 49.9 percent in December compared with 53.8 percent a year earlier, according to a Sigma Dos poll of 1,000 people published Jan. 5 in El Mundo newspaper. Juan Carlos should abdicate in favor of his son Prince Felipe, 62 percent of respondents said.

The 76 year-old King hesitated and stumbled repeatedly when reading an address to military chiefs yesterday. The speech was Juan Carlos’s first public appearance outside the palace since undergoing a hip operation in November.

To contact the reporter on this story: Ben Sills in Madrid at

To contact the editor responsible for this story: James Hertling at

Press spacebar to pause and continue. Press esc to stop.

Bloomberg reserves the right to remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.