D.R. Horton Can Require Agreements Barring Class Actions

D.R. Horton Inc. won a U.S. appeals court ruling that it can require arbitration agreements barring workers from bringing class-action lawsuits against it.

The U.S. Court of Appeals in New Orleans today rejected a National Labor Relations Board determination that D.R. Horton violated federal labor law by requiring its employees to sign arbitration agreements prohibiting collective, or class-action claims.

“We disagree” with the NLRB’s decision, “and conclude that the board’s decision did not give proper weight to the Federal Arbitration Act,” the appeals court said in a 2-1 decision.

The court upheld the NLRB’s requirement that D.R. Horton must “clarify with its employees” that such agreements don’t preclude their rights to pursue unfair labor practices claims with the NLRB, according to the ruling.

Gregory King, an NLRB spokesman, didn’t immediately respond to a phone call after regular business hours seeking comment on today’s ruling.

Jessica Hansen, a spokeswoman for D.R. Horton, didn’t immediately respond to a call after regular business hours.

D.R. Horton, based in Fort Worth, Texas, is the largest U.S. homebuilder by revenue.

The case is D.R. Horton Inc. (DHI) v. National Labor Relations Board, 12-60031, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (New Orleans).

To contact the reporter on this story: Joel Rosenblatt in San Francisco at jrosenblatt@bloomberg.net

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Michael Hytha at mhytha@bloomberg.net

Press spacebar to pause and continue. Press esc to stop.

Bloomberg reserves the right to remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.