Rural/Metro Wins Tentative Approval of $11.6 Million Pact

Rural/Metro Corp., the bankrupt ambulance service, won a judge’s tentative approval for a lawsuit settlement that will distribute as much as $11.6 million to stockholders of record before a $438 million buyout in 2011.

Investors sued Rural/Metro, based in Scottsdale, Arizona, in April 2011 contending the $17.25-a-share offer by Warburg Pincus LLC was “grossly inadequate.”

The settlement “delivered real value,” said Delaware Chancery Court Judge J. Travis Laster at a hearing in Wilmington today. “Getting that cash was not easy.”

Laster also awarded plaintiffs’ lawyers more than $4 million in fees and expenses. The agreement is subject to review by the U.S. Bankruptcy Court.

The settlement is being funded with $5 million from financial adviser Moelis & Co. and the rest from Rural/Metro. The fairness of Moelis’s financial analysis had been questioned, according to court papers. As part of the settlement defendants deny all allegations of wrongdoing and deny they acted improperly.

The buyout was completed on June 30, 2011. The company filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in Wilmington on Aug. 4, in a reorganization aimed at eliminating more than $300 million in debt. Rural/Metro cited “reduced revenue and delayed cash collections” as a reason for its distress.

Neither Ed Trissel, a Warburg Pincus spokesman, nor Andrea Hurst of Moelis immediately responded to requests for comment on the settlement. Both companies are based in New York.

The case is In re Rural/Metro Corp. Shareholders Litigation, CA6350, Delaware Chancery Court (Wilmington). The bankruptcy is In re Rural/Metro, 13-bk-11952, U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of Delaware (Wilmington).

To contact the reporter on this story: Phil Milford in Delaware Chancery Court at pmilford@bloomberg.net

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Michael Hytha at mhytha@bloomberg.net

Press spacebar to pause and continue. Press esc to stop.

Bloomberg reserves the right to remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.