Cattle Rise on Increased Demand From Beef Processors; Hogs Gain

Cattle futures rose for the third straight session, the longest rally in two weeks, on signs that improved demand from U.S. beef processors is tightening supplies of the animals. Hog prices also advanced.

Meatpackers processed 618,000 cattle in the week ended Oct. 26, up 0.2 percent from a week earlier, U.S. Department of Agriculture data show. Wholesale-beef prices are up 9.2 percent since the end of July, and cattle futures last week touched a nine-month high. The U.S. herd as of Jan. 1 was the smallest for that date since 1952 after last year’s drought destroyed pastures and forced ranchers to send animals to slaughter sooner than normal, according to the USDA.

“Meatpackers still want to buy cattle,” even after the rally in prices, Lane Broadbent, the president of KIS Futures Inc., said in a telephone interview from Oklahoma City. “Long-term, this supply issue is not going to get any better.”

Cattle futures for December delivery gained 0.5 percent to $1.33625 a pound at 11:21 a.m. on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange, heading for the longest rally since Oct. 14. Prices are up 11 percent since the end of May, and on Oct. 25 touched $1.347, the highest for a most-active contract since Jan. 15. Feeder-cattle futures for January settlement rose 0.4 percent to $1.6665 a pound.

Beef exports climbed 3.3 percent to 1.69 billion pounds (767,777 metric tons) in the eight months through Aug. 31, compared with the same period a year earlier, according to the USDA. Wholesale beef fetched $2.0341 today, the highest since June 6, government data show.

Hog futures for December settlement advanced 0.7 percent to 91.05 cents a pound on the CME. The most-active contract increased 2.8 percent last week and is up 5 percent this month.

To contact the reporter on this story: Dalton Barker in Chicago at

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Steve Stroth at

Press spacebar to pause and continue. Press esc to stop.

Bloomberg reserves the right to remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.