Market Snapshot
  • U.S.
  • Europe
  • Asia
Ticker Volume Price Price Delta
DJIA 14,954.30 -178.82 -1.18%
S&P 500 1,674.37 -19.50 -1.15%
Nasdaq 3,755.73 -59.29 -1.55%
Ticker Volume Price Price Delta
STOXX 50 2,902.12 -16.19 -0.55%
FTSE 100 6,449.04 +11.54 0.18%
DAX 8,597.91 -31.51 -0.37%
Ticker Volume Price Price Delta
Nikkei 14,157.20 -13.24 -0.09%
Hang Seng 23,214.40 +229.92 1.00%
S&P/ASX 200 5,234.89 +19.33 0.37%

Ex-JPMorgan Dealer Has Woolly Grasp of Confidentiality, FCA Says

Ian Hannam, formerly one of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)’s top merger advisers, is fighting a proposed market-abuse fine with a “woolly, implicit understanding of confidentiality,” lawyers for a U.K. regulator told a court.

Hannam is contesting a 450,000 pound ($728,505) civil market-abuse fine from the Financial Conduct Authority in a London trial that started in July. Hannam was seeking more bidders for Heritage Oil Plc (HOIL), when he disclosed to an investor in 2008 that another potential acquirer had made an offer.

If the information Hannam passed to his client Heritage Oil Plc is “not inside information, what is inside information?” Richard Boulton, a lawyer for the FCA, said during closing arguments today. If Hannam wins “it opens the floodgates to the selective disclosure of inside information.”

Hannam, who resigned from the New York-based bank after the civil fine, is one of the highest-profile finance workers the regulator has sought to fine. Hannam was among the bankers advising Xstrata Plc before it was acquired by Glencore International Plc.

Lawyers for Hannam, who hasn’t been charged with a crime, will present their final arguments later today.

Two e-mail messages form the basis of the FCA’s case. Hannam, has said the notes were in the “best interest” of his client, Heritage Oil.

To contact the reporter on this story: Suzi Ring in London at sring5@bloomberg.net

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Anthony Aarons at aaarons@bloomberg.net

Bloomberg reserves the right to edit or remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

Sponsored Link