U.S. Treasury Says Money Managers May Pose ‘Herding’ Threat

The Treasury Department said money managers could pose threats to the U.S. financial system when reaching for higher returns, herding into popular asset classes or amplifying price movements with leverage.

Companies overseeing a combined $53 trillion in assets, led by fund giants BlackRock Inc. (BLK) and Vanguard Group Inc., can contribute to asset price increases and magnify volatility during sudden shocks, a report by the Treasury said today. Gaps in data, particularly on investments managed for institutions, limited the study’s ability to identify additional risk.

“A certain combination of fund- and firm-level activities within a large, complex firm, or engagement by a significant number of asset managers in riskier activities, could pose, amplify or transmit a threat to the financial system,” the Treasury’s Office of Financial Research said in the report.

The study was conducted by the OFR to help the Financial Stability Oversight Council analyze whether asset managers should be considered systemically important and subject to Federal Reserve supervision.

“The council will review the study closely as it considers potential next steps relating to asset management activities and firms,” Treasury spokeswoman Suzanne Elio said in an e-mail.

The council is authorized under the Dodd-Frank financial regulatory law to identify companies that could pose a threat to stability. The Fed can impose on such firms tighter capital, leverage and liquidity rules and demand measures including stress-testing and wind-down plans.

Fed Chairman

The council, or FSOC, is led by Treasury Secretary Jacob J. Lew and includes Fed Chairman Ben S. Bernanke.

“We continue to believe that designation as systemically important financial institutions, or ‘SIFIs,’ is not an appropriate regulatory tool for addressing risks, if any, that registered funds or their advisers might raise regarding financial stability,” Mike McNamee, a spokesman for the Investment Company Institute in Washington, said in an e-mailed statement today.

The ICI is the trade association representing the mutual funds industry.

“BlackRock will continue to work with regulators to promote a more stable and well-functioning financial system and we support their efforts to increase transparency, protect investors, and facilitate responsible growth of capital markets,” BlackRock spokesman Brian Beades said in an e-mailed statement.

Systemically Important

FSOC has designated three non-bank financial companies -- American International Group Inc., General Electric Co.’s finance unit and Prudential Financial Inc. -- as systemically important.

Exchange-traded funds “may transmit or amplify financial shocks originating elsewhere” by pooling assets into illiquid investments, like emerging market stocks or high-yield debt, the OFR said. ETFs are baskets of securities, typically tracking an index, that trade on an exchange like stocks.

“Herding into more illiquid investments may have a greater potential to create adverse market impacts if financial shocks trigger a reversal of the herding behavior,” the OFR said.

John Woerth, of Valley Forge, Pennsylvania-based Vanguard, declined immediate comment because the company hadn’t fully reviewed the report.

“I don’t think the asset managers will like the study because some parts of it read like the FSOC’s analysis when they designated AIG and Prudential,” said Joseph Engelhard, a former Treasury Department official who is now senior vice president at Capital Alpha Partners LLC in Washington. Still, the OFR didn’t indicate it reached a conclusion on whether asset managers should be designated systemically important, he said.

To contact the reporters on this story: Christopher Condon in Boston at ccondon4@bloomberg.net; Ian Katz in Washington at ikatz2@bloomberg.net

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Christian Baumgaertel at cbaumgaertel@bloomberg.net

Press spacebar to pause and continue. Press esc to stop.

Bloomberg reserves the right to remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.