Airbus Throws Out Workshare Rule as Government Involvement Wanes
Stock Chart for European Aeronautic Defence and Space Co NV (EAD)
Airbus SAS said it won’t return to a previous practice of apportioning work on new programs by national ownership structure, adding to signs that the European manufacturer is emancipating itself from political meddling.
Airbus first dropped the practice on its A350 wide-body jet, where the fact that France got more work so riled the German government that it continues to withhold some financial aid. Even so, the Toulouse, France-based company will continue in its new vein, said Tom Enders, the chief executive officer of Airbus parent European Aeronautic, Defence & Space Co.
“We broke with previous decades’ practice of work-share being assigned according to an artificial kind of national split,” Ender told journalists in Paris. “It was the first program where we looked at what is the best, most competitive supplier, and that’s certainly something we’ll insist on going forward.”
The comment highlights a liberation from government ties that Enders, a German and vocal critic of political involvement in his company has sought to push through. Airbus contributes 80 percent of revenue to the parent company, and Enders sought to balance out civil and defense sales last year with a merger with BAE Systems Plc (BA/), which failed because of opposition from Germany’s government.
Germany has complained that Airbus’s factories there were given less work than those in France on the long-range A350 jet, due to enter service in 2014.
Germany has pledged 1.1 billion euros ($1.56 billion) toward the A350, or one third of the contribution made together with France and the U.K. The A350’s development costs amount to about 11 billion euros.
EADS, also based in Toulouse, has overhauled its shareholder structure since the collapse of the BAE discussions late last year. Germany, which previously held no direct stake in the company, gained a 12 percent to match France’s reduced holding.
At the same time, governments no longer have the special veto rights that they possessed under the old structure.
To contact the reporter on this story: Andrea Rothman in Toulouse at email@example.com
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Benedikt Kammel at firstname.lastname@example.org
Bloomberg reserves the right to edit or remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.