U.K. Seen Fighting EU Benchmarks Plan in Next Financial Clash

Photographer: Jock Fistick/Bloomberg

The U.K. is concerned that European Union Financial Services Commissioner Michel Barnier's plans cover too wide a range of benchmarks and that rules on using rates set outside the EU could restrict the activities of firms operating in Britain, according to another person who asked not to be named because negotiations are private. Close

The U.K. is concerned that European Union Financial Services Commissioner Michel... Read More

Close
Open
Photographer: Jock Fistick/Bloomberg

The U.K. is concerned that European Union Financial Services Commissioner Michel Barnier's plans cover too wide a range of benchmarks and that rules on using rates set outside the EU could restrict the activities of firms operating in Britain, according to another person who asked not to be named because negotiations are private.

U.K. officials, emboldened by a series of victories on financial regulation, are set to challenge European Union plans to toughen rules for benchmarks underpinning markets from interest rates to oil prices over concerns the proposals will unfairly burden banks.

The U.K. will seek improvements to the proposals made yesterday by Michel Barnier, the EU’s financial services chief, to ensure they are sensible, proportionate and internationally coherent, according to a British official who isn’t allowed to be cited by name, in line with government policy.

The EU plans, designed to restore trust amid rate-rigging scandals, include requiring banks and other companies that submit benchmark data to sign up to legally binding codes of conduct. The Brussels-based European Commission would also win powers to decide if benchmarks set outside the EU can be used.

The commission plans are “impulsive and premature,” Syed Kamall, a U.K. Conservative lawmaker representing London in the European Parliament said in an e-mail. EU Commissioners “should wait for evidence before jumping into action and should allow markets to operate freely unless and until there is a very compelling reason to step in.”

The U.K. concerns over the benchmark proposals follow three victories for the nation last week in tussles with the EU over financial regulation. Plans for an 11-nation financial transaction tax and enhanced powers to ban short-selling, both opposed by the U.K., were criticized by EU lawyers and a senior official at the European Court of Justice. The EU executive arm also scrapped a proposal in the draft benchmark rules to hand oversight of London’s interbank offered rate to a Paris-based regulator.

Too Wide

The U.K. is concerned that Barnier’s plans cover too wide a range of benchmarks and that rules on using rates set outside the EU could restrict the activities of firms operating in Britain, according to another person who asked not to be named because negotiations are private.

Barnier’s spokeswoman, Chantal Hughes, said she didn’t have an immediate comment on the U.K.’s position.

Under Barnier’s proposals banks and other companies within the EU would only be allowed to base a financial instrument on a benchmark that is administered in the EU or in another country that has rules judged as “equivalent” to those in the 28-nation bloc.

The commission would be in charge of the equivalence decisions and would “in particular” assess whether nations comply with principles drawn up by the International Organization of Securities Commissions.

Bank Fines

Authorities have fined UBS AG, Barclays Plc (BARC) and Royal Bank of Scotland Group Plc (RBS) about $2.5 billion for distorting the London interbank offered rate, or Libor, and other interbank rates. Other firms are under investigation around the world.

Yesterday’s EU proposals would apply to “all published benchmarks that are used to reference a financial instrument traded or admitted to trading on a regulated venue,” as well as those that underpin financial contracts such as mortgages and those that measure the performance of an investment fund, according to the commission. An exemption would apply for rates set by EU central banks.

“To suggest that all benchmarks and indices are faulty and in need of regulating on the basis of the Libor experience is absurd,” Kamall said. “It shows no logic and no concept of limited intervention.”

To contact the reporters on this story: Jim Brunsden in Brussels at jbrunsden@bloomberg.net; Svenja O’Donnell in London at sodonnell@bloomberg.net

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Anthony Aarons at aaarons@bloomberg.net

Bloomberg reserves the right to remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.