Citigroup Capital Ratio to Top Minimum Under Bank-Run Test

Citigroup Inc. (C), the third-largest U.S. bank by assets, could incur $21.2 billion of losses over nine quarters through mid-2015 and stay above minimum regulatory capital levels in a severe financial downturn.

The bank’s Tier 1 common capital ratio would fall to as low as 9.1 percent under a severely adverse scenario, above the 5 percent minimum set by U.S. regulators, the New York-based company said today in a presentation on its website. Citigroup’s projections come from a stress test mandated by the 2010 Dodd-Frank Act.

The biggest U.S. banks, including JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Bank of America Corp., must conduct so-called mid-cycle stress tests using their own scenarios and disclose a summary of the results.

Citigroup’s figures assume $43.1 billion in pre-provision net revenue and an equal amount of loan losses in the nine quarters from the end of March 2013 through June 2015. Credit cards would account for $19.9 billion of the losses, according to the presentation. Trading and counterparty losses, not included in the loan-loss estimate, would total $10 billion.

Citigroup climbed 1.3 percent to $51.14 at 10:47 a.m. in New York, the third-best performance among 24 U.S. lenders in the KBW Bank Index, which gained 1 percent.

The adverse scenario assumes interest rates will drop and remain low, severe declines in home prices and a disruption to international trade for a “prolonged period,” Citigroup said. Emerging-market economies most dependent on trade experienced average declines in gross domestic product of 9 percentage points, while those only moderately dependent on trade contracted 5 percentage points, the firm said.

To contact the reporter on this story: Dakin Campbell in New York at dcampbell27@bloomberg.net

To contact the editors responsible for this story: David Scheer at dscheer@bloomberg.net; Christine Harper at charper@bloomberg.net

Bloomberg reserves the right to edit or remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.