Breaking News

VTB Bank, Bank of Moscow Targeted by Latest U.S. Sanctions
Tweet TWEET

Summers’s Fed Put Beats Bernanke’s for Potency: Cutting Research

Photographer: Jay Mallin/Bloomberg

Lawrence Summers, former director of the U.S. National Economic Council. Close

Lawrence Summers, former director of the U.S. National Economic Council.

Close
Open
Photographer: Jay Mallin/Bloomberg

Lawrence Summers, former director of the U.S. National Economic Council.

A Federal Reserve headed by Lawrence Summers may give financial markets even stronger support in times of stress than it did under Ben S. Bernanke.

That’s according to David Zervos, managing director at Jefferies LLC in New York, who served as a visiting adviser to the Fed in 2009. In a Sept. 3 report to clients he outlined what he called the “Summers put,” a reference to investors’ belief in the “Greenspan put,” the idea that the Fed under Alan Greenspan always acted to support financial markets.

“Larry is no fool and for someone who loves the art of the bailout, this is by far the best seat in the house,” said Zervos. “The chair of the Federal Reserve offers unprecedented monetary and fiscal policy-making opportunities -- especially in a time of crisis.” A put option gives investors the right to sell their asset at a set price.

President Barack Obama needs to nominate a successor to Bernanke, whose second term ends in January. He has identified Harvard University professor and former Treasury Secretary Summers and Fed Vice Chairman Janet Yellen as candidates.

As speculation swirls around Obama picking Summers, Zervos is the latest analyst to debate what that might mean for investors. Economists at BNP Paribas SA said in an Aug. 29 report that a Summers-led Fed would mean 10-year Treasury yields would be 50 basis points higher than if Yellen were in charge and economic growth as much as 0.75 percent weaker over the next two years. Summers questioned the effectiveness of quantitative easing in an April conference hosted by Drobny Global Advisors.

Zervos is less sure that Summers would be more “hawkish” than Bernanke. He noted that as director of Obama’s National Economic Council, Summers played a role in bailing out banks and the automobile industry during the recent financial crisis. As Treasury undersecretary in the 1990s, Summers also helped craft a rescue plan to ease Mexico’s financial crisis.

Summers’ academic work also “always found a crucial role for government intervention,” said Zervos.

By contrast, Bernanke “rarely stepped in pre-emptively with policy bailouts or backstops,” so is perhaps less supportive of markets than Summers, he said. Summers could also profit from Bernanke’s approach to policy making, in which a “creative” reading of its statute allowed the Fed to pursue more aggressive efforts in establishing currency swaps, the Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility and other initiatives.

Summers, though, may be less likely than Bernanke to use quantitative easing-style policies to fight deflation, Zervos said. Instead, a Summers-led Fed may prefer to start a program in which the Fed helps support private sector lending, he said.

“In that sense, I actually think a Summers put will be more potent and have fewer nasty side effects than a Bernanke put,” Zervos said. “I’m a buyer of the Summers put.”

* * *

Google Inc.’s (GOOG) search engine may have the ability to predict recessions, according to a former Bank of Canada economist.

Tracking the extent to which users typed “recession” and “jobs” into Google could have predicted Canada’s 2008-2009 recession by as much as three months in advance, Greg Tkacz, chairman of the department of economics at St. Francis Xavier University in Antigonish, Nova Scotia, wrote in a report published Sept. 4.

While such high-frequency indicators are in their infancy, Tkacz said Internet search engines will serve as useful inputs for monitoring economies.

“Their timeliness can potentially help policy makers recognize downturns as they occur and obtain a better measure of their severity in real time, thereby helping to devise appropriate policy responses,” he said.

* * *

The Fed’s communication powers are fading.

In a study of so-called forward guidance, economists at the Fed Bank of Kansas City found a weakening in the response of both stock prices and bond yields on days when the central bank made major monetary policy announcements.

For bond yields, the reason may be the expectation of greater stability in policy. The response of stocks may have diminished because investors previously revised down their economic outlook when the Fed indicated it would be more accommodative, said authors Taeyoung Doh and Michael Connolly in a report published this week.

“As a result, the stimulus from such policy announcements was weakened,” they said.

* * *

The Fed’s unconventional monetary policy announcements of 2008 to 2009 had significant effects abroad by reducing international long-term bond yields and the value of the dollar.

That’s the finding of an August working paper by St. Louis Fed Bank economist Christopher J. Neely that studied the reverberations of the Fed’s decisions to signal its rate outlook and buy long-term securities. The paper’s release is apt given the debate among policy makers about how much the Fed will influence other markets when it begins to pull back aid.

The stimulus actions “significantly reduced” the 10-year bond yields of Australia, Canada, Germany, Japan and the U.K., Neely said. Australia’s fell as much as 63 basis points. The dollar also dropped against the currencies of these countries. Each of the countries’ central banks also eased their interest rates during that period.

“These changes closely followed announcements and were very unlikely to have occurred by chance,” Neely said.

His research proved that “central banks are not toothless” when benchmark interest rates have reached zero. He suggested central banks also should “coordinate their unconventional policies to avoid contradictory or overly stimulative effects.”

* * *

One of the first economists to warn an asset-price bubble was forming ahead of the financial crisis is now declaring there is no science to monetary policy -- and it’s being relied on too much to revive the world economy.

In a paper published last week by the Fed Bank of Dallas, William White said the fashions of economic theory and changes in the financial system help explain how monetary policy has changed over time. The knowledge of science, by comparison, evolves slowly and because of external realities.

“Looking back at the conduct of monetary policy over the last 50 years, one must be impressed by the changes observed in every aspect of the business,” said White.

White retired in 2009 from the Basel, Switzerland-based Bank for International Settlements, having warned prior to the 2008 financial crisis that central banks might need to raise interest rates to combat asset bubbles. He now chairs the Economic Development and Review Committee at the Paris-based Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.

One lesson from the vagaries of economic management is that policy makers may not be able to easily separate price and financial stability challenges, he wrote. Short-term aims can’t be addressed without thinking about longer-term fallout in markets and economies, he said.

“Monetary policy remains more art than science and the artists remain all too human and fallible,” White said. “The conclusion that we need to widen the array of policy tools directed to economic stabilization clearly applies to the prevention or moderation of the next crisis. It applies, however, equally or even more strongly to the management of the current one.”

* * *

Gamblers may be better at predicting the outlook for the U.K. economy than Bank of England Governor Mark Carney.

That’s the bet of the London-based Adam Smith Institute, a research group dedicated to the free market economy. Noting that the U.K. central bank has often gotten its economic forecasts wrong, the institute last week united with Paddy Power Plc to create two betting markets that let members of the public wager on the performances of U.K. inflation and unemployment.

The theory is that bookmaker odds are more reliable than a handful of expert opinions because betting markets collect the judgments of thousands of people. Moreover, gamblers have a strong financial incentive to bet in a dispassionate way, washing out individual biases, Sam Bowman, the institute’s research director, said in an Aug. 28 blog.

“If these markets catch on, the government should consider outsourcing all of its forecasts to prediction markets instead of expert forecasters,” he said.

To contact the reporter on this story: Simon Kennedy in London at skennedy4@bloomberg.net

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Craig Stirling at cstirling1@bloomberg.net

Bloomberg reserves the right to remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.