Gallup to Pay $10.5 Million to Settle U.S. Contract Claim

Gallup Organization agreed to pay $10.5 million to settle U.S. claims that it inflated contract prices and engaged in prohibited employment negotiations with a government official, the Justice Department said.

Gallup knowingly overstated costs in contract proposals to the U.S. Mint and the State Department that were to be awarded without competition, according to U.S. allegations in a False Claims Act suit against the polling and market-research firm. The company also improperly discussed employment with a then-Federal Emergency Management Agency official, Timothy Cannon, to obtain a FEMA subcontract at an inflated price, the government alleged.

“This case exposed a cozy arrangement between a contractor and government employee where nobody was looking out for the American taxpayer,” Ronald Machen Jr., U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia, said today in a statement.

Alena Naff, a spokeswoman for Gallup, said in an e-mail, “By ending this civil action with no admission of wrongdoing, Gallup can avoid further distraction and focus on serving its customers.”

Cannon in April agreed to pay $40,000 to resolve allegations that he tried to get a job with Gallup while overseeing its FEMA subcontract. He was sentenced to probation in a related criminal case.

The allegations against Gallup were originally brought under the whistle-blower provisions of the False Claims Act by Michael Lindley, Gallup’s former director of client services.

Lindley will receive $1.9 million as his share of the government’s recovery.

The case is U.S. ex rel. Lindley v. Gallup Organization, 09-cv-01985, U.S. District Court, District of Columbia (Washington).

To contact the reporter on this story: Andrew Zajac in Washington at azajac@bloomberg.net

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Andrew Dunn at adunn8@bloomberg.net

Press spacebar to pause and continue. Press esc to stop.

Bloomberg reserves the right to remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.