Barclays Unit Wins Dismissal of Regulator’s Lawsuit

A Barclays Plc (BARC) investment-banking unit won the dismissal of the National Credit Union Administration’s lawsuit accusing it of making misleading statements about mortgage-backed securities to credit unions that later failed.

U.S. District Judge John W. Lungstrum in Kansas City, Kansas, today granted a defense motion to dismiss the case filed last year, ruling it was time-barred. The judge said he has seven similar NCUA lawsuits pending before him.

The unit formerly known as Barclays Capital was accused of violating state and federal laws in the sale of more than $555 million in securities to the U.S. Federal Credit Union and the Western Corporate Federal Credit Union in 2006 and 2007.

NCUA, an Alexandria, Virginia-based federal agency, is responsible for recovering losses to minimize the costs to its industry-paid stabilization fund.

Lungstrum ruled the regulator was required to file its claims against Barclays no later than March 20, 2012, three years after it was appointed conservator for the two failed credit unions. The case wasn’t filed until September of last year.

John Fairbanks, a spokesman for the NCUA, said he couldn’t immediately comment on the court’s decision. Barclays, based in London, is the U.K.’s second-largest bank by assets.

The judge, who in April threw out some claims in a separate NCUA lawsuit against units of Credit Suisse Group AG (CSGN) because they too were untimely, reaffirmed that ruling in a separate decision today.

“Congress intended that the right to sue be extinguished at the expiration of the limitations period imposed by the extender statute,” Lungstrum wrote.

The case is National Credit Union Administration v. Barclays Capital, 12-cv-2631, U.S. District Court, District of Kansas (Kansas City).

To contact the reporter on this story: Andrew Harris in the Chicago federal courthouse at

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Michael Hytha at

Press spacebar to pause and continue. Press esc to stop.

Bloomberg reserves the right to remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.