ACLU Sues U.S. Government Over Phone Records ‘Dragnet’

Will NSA Surveillance Change the Internet? June 12 (Bloomberg) -- Porter Bibb, managing director at Mediatech Capital Partners and David Kirkpatrick, author of "The Facebook Effect," discuss what NSA data collection means for the internet and users' views on privacy. They speak on Bloomberg Television's "Bloomberg Surveillance."

The U.S. government violated the privacy and free speech of civilians with its “dragnet acquisition” of phone records under a National Security Agency program, the American Civil Liberties Union said in a lawsuit.

The complaint is one of the first to take aim at a program, administered under the anti-terror Patriot Act, to collect the telephone records of all Verizon Communications Inc (VZ). customers and turn them over to the NSA. After news organizations disclosed the program, the Obama administration confirmed last week that a secret court had approved the collection.

“The practice is akin to snatching every American’s address book —- with annotations detailing whom we spoke to, when we talked, for how long, and from where,” the ACLU said in the complaint filed yesterday in federal court in Manhattan.

The ACLU is a customer of Verizon Business Network Services, which was the recipient of the secret court’s order published by the Guardian newspaper last week, the organization said yesterday in a statement. The order required the company to “turn over on an ongoing daily basis phone call details” such as who calls are placed to and from, and when those calls are made, the group said.

Photographer: Win McNamee/Getty Images

U.S. President Barack Obama's administration confirmed the National Security Agency program last week after news reports disclosed it. Close

U.S. President Barack Obama's administration confirmed the National Security Agency... Read More

Close
Open
Photographer: Win McNamee/Getty Images

U.S. President Barack Obama's administration confirmed the National Security Agency program last week after news reports disclosed it.

“The fact that the government is collecting this information is likely to have a chilling effect on people who would otherwise contact” the ACLU, the organization said in the complaint.

Eric Schultz, a spokesman for the White House, and Nanda Chitre, a Justice Department spokeswoman, said they had no comment on the lawsuit.

Records Collection

James Clapper, director of national intelligence and a defendant named in the lawsuit, said June 7 that the records collection is lawful and aimed at thwarting terrorism. The phone records program, and another to collect Internet data, are authorized under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, he said.

Intelligence agencies are authorized by Congress to get broad electronic surveillance orders from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court.

The ACLU alleges the records collection exceeds the limits set by the Patriot Act, a law passed after the 2001 terrorist attacks that expanded the government’s surveillance and data collection efforts to combat terrorism.

A 2008 ACLU lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of the FISA Amendments Act, which authorized warrantless wiretapping, was dismissed 5-4 by the U.S. Supreme Court in February on grounds that the plaintiffs couldn’t prove they had been monitored, the group said in a statement.

The ACLU seeks a court order declaring the tracking program unconstitutional and forcing the government to purge all call records collected.

The case is American Civil Liberties Union v. Clapper, 13-cv-03994, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York (Manhattan).

To contact the reporter on this story: Karen Gullo in San Francisco at kgullo@bloomberg.net

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Michael Hytha at mhytha@bloomberg.net

Press spacebar to pause and continue. Press esc to stop.

Bloomberg reserves the right to remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.