Sam Wyly Wins Ruling Limiting Civil Penalties in SEC Lawsuit

Sam Wyly, the former Michaels Stores Inc. (MIK) chairman sued by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission for alleged insider trading and securities fraud, won a ruling limiting the civil penalties the agency can seek.

U.S. District Judge Shira Scheindlin in Manhattan in an order today agreed with Wyly that a U.S. Supreme Court ruling in February bars the SEC from seeking civil penalties more than five years after the alleged violations.

A tolling agreement between the SEC and Wyly in 2006, which stops the clock on the statute of limitations, will limit any civil penalties to violations that occurred after Feb. 1, 2001, according to the judge’s order. The SEC alleges that Wyly and his late brother Charles made fraudulent and false filings as early as 1992, according to the ruling.

In addition to civil penalties, the SEC seeks about $550 million in disgorgement of ill-gotten gains. The judge’s ruling on civil penalties didn’t address the SEC’s disgorgement request.

John Nester, an SEC spokesman. said in an e-mail that the agency is reviewing the decision.

The SEC sued in 2010, after a six-year investigation, and accused the brothers of using “an elaborate sham system of trusts and subsidiary companies” in the Isle of Man and Cayman Islands in a 13-year scheme to hide their ownership of stock in four public companies on whose boards they sat.

The case is Securities and Exchange Commission v. Wyly, 10-cv-05760, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York (Manhattan).

To contact the reporter on this story: Edvard Pettersson in the Los Angeles federal court house at +1-

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Michael Hytha at

Press spacebar to pause and continue. Press esc to stop.

Bloomberg reserves the right to remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.